Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

A Vibrotactile Feedback Device for Seated Balance Assessment and Training
Published on: January 20, 2019
Determining optimum seat depth using comfort and discomfort assessments
Samira Bahrampour1, Jalil Nazari1, Iman Dianat1
1Department of Occupational Health and Ergonomics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to determine optimum seat depth using subjective assessments. Comfort and discomfort evaluation, as an ergonomic subjective method, was used to find the optimum seat depth. A total of 36 university students rated the comfort and discomfort of six different seat depths (including 32.0, 37.0, 42.0, 47.0 and 52.0 cm which covered the buttock-popliteal length [BPL] range as well as 40.2 cm representing the 5th percentile of the BPL) during a 90-min period using a chair evaluation checklist. The results showed that a seat depth of 40.2 cm (equivalent to the 5th percentile of the BPL) was more comfortable and caused less discomfort ratings after 90 min compared to other experimental seat depths. The findings suggest that an appropriate seat depth for the studied population can be recommended based on the 5th percentile of the BPL as an anthropometric criterion.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Uniform Depth Channel Flow
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Uniform Depth Channel Flow: Problem Solving
Determining Order of Reaction
Determination

