Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

A Comparative Approach to Characterize the Landscape of Host-Pathogen Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: July 18, 2013
Energy Landscape of the Designed Protein Top7
Sridhar Neelamraju1,2, Shachi Gosavi1, David J Wales2
1Simons Centre for the Study of Living Machines, National Centre for Biological Sciences , Tata Institute of Fundamental Research , Bangalore , Karnataka 560065 , India.
Protein folding landscapes can be trapped by topology. This study compares a designed protein (Top7) to a natural protein (S6), finding the designed protein has more topological traps, highlighting challenges in de novo protein design.
Area of Science:
- Biophysics
- Computational Biology
- Protein Science
Background:
- Proteins fold via funnelled energy landscapes, but topological traps can impede folding.
- De novo designed proteins may exhibit increased topological trapping due to lack of evolutionary optimization.
- Structure-based models (SBMs) isolate topological effects on protein folding landscapes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the topological trapping and potential energy landscapes (PELs) of a designed protein (Top7) and a natural protein (S6).
- To quantify the impact of protein topology on folding pathways and identify kinetic traps.
- To investigate how non-native interactions and coarse-graining affect frustration in protein folding.
Main Methods:
- Utilized structure-based models (SBMs) to simulate protein folding and analyze energy landscapes.
- Compared the designed protein Top7 with the natural ribosomal protein S6.
- Quantified topological trapping and frustration using a frustration density parameter and probability contact maps.
Main Results:
- The designed protein Top7 exhibited a more frustrated potential energy landscape (PEL) than the natural protein S6, even within an SBM.
- Adding coarse-grained side-chains increased frustration, while adding non-native hydrophobic interactions narrowed the folding funnel.
- Identified potential kinetic traps and quantified energetic barriers for both proteins.
Conclusions:
- Protein topology significantly influences the folding energy landscape and can lead to kinetic traps, particularly in designed proteins.
- Quantitative analysis of frustration density and folding routes is crucial for understanding and optimizing protein design.
- This work provides insights for designing proteins with optimized, structure-seeking landscapes, mimicking evolutionary processes.
Related Concept Videos
What is Energy?
Free Energy
Activation Energy
Group Design
Energy Basics
Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States

