Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Anesthesia and evoked potentials: overview.

A Koht1

  • 1Department of Anesthesia, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611.

International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

Anesthetic agents can alter evoked potentials, impacting intraoperative monitoring. Understanding these effects is crucial for accurate surgical assessment and preventing misinterpretations during procedures.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does midazolam cause retrograde amnesia, and can flumazenil reverse that amnesia?

Anesthesia and analgesia·1997
Same author

Effects of sufentanil on median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials.

British journal of anaesthesia·1990
Same author

Surgical and electrophysiological observations during clipping of 134 aneurysms with evoked potential monitoring.

Neurosurgery·1990
Same author

Improvement of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials by etomidate.

Anesthesia and analgesia·1988
Same author

Effects of etomidate, midazolam, and thiopental on median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials and the additive effects of fentanyl and nitrous oxide.

Anesthesia and analgesia·1988
Same author

Reversible loss of somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical spinal fusion.

Anesthesia and analgesia·1986

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Anesthesiology
  • Surgical Monitoring

Background:

  • Evoked potentials (EPs) are vital for intraoperative monitoring, detecting surgical changes that may cause postoperative deficits.
  • Non-surgical factors, particularly anesthetic agents, can also influence EPs, potentially reducing monitoring accuracy.
  • Differentiating between surgical and anesthetic effects on EPs is essential for optimizing intraoperative monitoring yield.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the impact of various anesthetic agents and techniques on evoked potentials during intraoperative monitoring.
  • To provide a comprehensive understanding of how premedication, induction, maintenance, and adjunct anesthetic agents affect EPs.
  • To guide the selection of anesthetic techniques that minimize interference with EP monitoring.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies examining anesthetic effects on evoked potentials.
  • Categorization of anesthetic agents (premedication, induction, maintenance, adjuncts) and their impact on EP waveforms.
  • Analysis of differences in EP changes across various anesthetic agents and techniques.

Main Results:

  • Anesthetic agents significantly alter evoked potentials, with effects varying based on the specific agent and dosage.
  • Premedication, induction, maintenance agents, and adjunct techniques all demonstrate distinct patterns of EP modulation.
  • Knowledge of these specific anesthetic-induced EP changes is critical for accurate intraoperative interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • Anesthesia profoundly influences evoked potentials, necessitating careful consideration during intraoperative monitoring.
  • Understanding the differential effects of anesthetic agents on EPs enhances the reliability of intraoperative monitoring.
  • Tailoring anesthetic management based on EP monitoring requirements is key to improving patient outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos