Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

AAEE minimonograph #29: automatic quantitative electromyography.

L J Dorfman1, K C McGill

  • 1Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.

Muscle & Nerve
|August 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Motor unit activity within the depth of the masseter characterized by an adapted scanning EMG technique.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2016
Same author

Neuroradiologic correlates of cognitive impairment in adult Moyamoya disease.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2011
Same author

Accuracy assessment of CKC high-density surface EMG decomposition in biceps femoris muscle.

Journal of neural engineering·2011
Same author

Automatic decomposition of multichannel intramuscular EMG signals.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2007
Same author

Surface electromyogram signal modelling.

Medical & biological engineering & computing·2004
Same author

A model of the muscle action potential for describing the leading edge, terminal wave, and slow afterwave.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2002
Same journal

Join AANEM.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Management and Prevention of Symptomatic Neuroma.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

AANEM News & Insights.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Fat-Fraction Quantification Using Three-Point Dixon Technique in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Its Correlation With Clinical Progression and Genotypic Characteristics: A Single Centre One-Year Prospective Study.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Characterizing Combined Central and Peripheral Demyelination-Insights From a Multimodal Comparison With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy and Multiple Sclerosis.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Electrical Modalities in the Rehabilitation of Peripheral Nerve Injuries: State of the Literature and Current Clinical Applications.

Muscle & nerve·2026
See all related articles

Computerized quantitative electromyography methods are reviewed, highlighting limitations in relating results to motor unit physiology. New techniques allow detailed analysis of motor unit action potentials for improved diagnostic capabilities.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Clinical Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Quantitative electromyography (QEMG) utilizes computerized methods to analyze muscle electrical activity.
  • Current QEMG techniques, such as interference pattern analysis (turns and spectral analysis), offer efficiency but limited physiological correlation.
  • Integration analysis has a minor role in diagnostic electromyography, while traditional single motor unit potential analysis is restricted to low-threshold units.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current status of various computerized automatic quantitative electromyography methods.
  • To assess the strengths and limitations of different QEMG techniques for neuromuscular electrodiagnosis.
  • To highlight emerging methodologies for enhanced motor unit analysis.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of interference pattern methods (turns analysis, spectral analysis).
  • Evaluation of integration analysis and traditional single motor unit potential measurement.
  • Discussion of novel decomposition techniques for interference patterns.
  • Mention of on-line normative data bases for statistical comparison.

Main Results:

  • Interference pattern methods are efficient but lack direct physiological correlation.
  • Integration analysis is not widely used diagnostically.
  • Computer assistance improves objectivity for traditional single motor unit analysis, but limits study to low-threshold units.
  • New methods enable decomposition of interference patterns for detailed motor unit property measurement.

Conclusions:

  • Quantitative electromyography methods have evolving applications in neuromuscular electrodiagnosis.
  • Advanced techniques offer improved potential for detailed motor unit analysis.
  • Computerized analysis facilitates objective assessment and comparison with normative data.