Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
Risk stratification of severe aortic stenosis according to new guidelines: long term outcomes
Andrea Colli1, Eleonora Bizzotto1, Laura Besola1
1Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Insights
Current guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement (AVR) for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Our study shows asymptomatic patients with reduced ejection fraction face poor survival, suggesting early AVR may benefit selected asymptomatic individuals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Valvular Heart Disease
Background:
- Current guidelines (ESC, ACC/AHA) recommend aortic valve replacement (AVR) for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis or asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%).
- This study evaluates long-term outcomes of AVR for aortic stenosis over 11 years, comparing them against current international guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing AVR for severe aortic stenosis.
- To compare these outcomes with current international guidelines for AVR indications.
- To identify patient subgroups that may benefit from earlier surgical intervention.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 607 patients who underwent isolated AVR for severe aortic valve stenosis between 2001 and 2012.
- Patients were stratified based on preoperative LVEF (<50% or ≥50%) and symptom status (NYHA class I vs. ≥II).
Main Results:
- Symptom status did not significantly impact cardiovascular mortality (P=0.201).
- Patients with LVEF <50% exhibited higher long-term cardiovascular mortality (P=0.015).
- Asymptomatic patients with reduced LVEF faced a higher risk of long-term mortality (P=0.011); age was the only other independent risk factor for death.
Conclusions:
- Current guideline indications for symptomatic patients ensure good long-term survival.
- Class I indications for asymptomatic patients with reduced LVEF are linked to poor long-term survival.
- Early AVR should be considered for asymptomatic patients with preserved LVEF, especially those at very low surgical risk.
Background:
Current ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease assign a class Ia indication for aortic valve replacement (AVR) only to patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis and asymptomatic patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) or positive exercise test. We examined the long-term outcomes for patients undergoing AVR for aortic stenosis over a 11-year period at our institution compared to current international guidelines for AVR.
Methods:
Patients who had undergone isolated AVR for severe aortic valve stenosis between January 2001 and December 2012 were selected. The population was divided into subgroups based on preoperative LVEF (< or ≥50%) and on presence/absence of symptoms (NYHA =I or ≥II, respectively).
Results:
We identified 607 patients with a median follow-up (FU) time of 5.75 years (IQR 3.24-8.00 years). The presence of symptoms did not have a significant impact on cardiovascular mortality (P=0.201). Patients with LVEF <50% displayed a higher long-term cardiovascular mortality rate (P=0.015). Multivariate analysis showed that preserved LVEF was a protective factor for asymptomatic patients (P=0.021), while preoperative LVEF did not affect the mortality rate in symptomatic patients (HR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.54-1.44). Correspondingly, asymptomatic patients with reduced LVEF were found to be at a higher risk of long-term mortality compared to the other groups (P=0.011). The only other independent risk factor for death was age (HR 6.46; 95% CI, 2.22-18.76).
Conclusions:
According to our data, current international class I indications for symptomatic patients ensure good long-term survival, while class I indications for asymptomatic patients with reduced LVEF are associated with poor long-term survival. Our results suggest that early surgery should also be considered also for asymptomatic patients with preserved LVEF, particularly in cases of very low operative risk.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Relative Risk
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Guidelines for Sketching a Curve
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.

