Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Valve durability after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Akash Kataruka1, Catherine M Otto1
1Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) offers good 5-year results for aortic stenosis. However, long-term durability of TAVI valves is not well understood, necessitating caution in younger patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis requires treatment, with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) being a minimally invasive option.
- While TAVI shows excellent short-term (5-year) outcomes, the long-term durability of the bioprosthetic valves remains largely unknown.
- TAVI valves are susceptible to structural valve deterioration (SVD) and non-SVD, similar to surgical bioprosthetic valves, but with unique degeneration mechanisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current understanding of long-term durability for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) devices.
- To identify mechanisms of TAVI valve degeneration, including both structural and non-structural factors.
- To compare TAVI valve durability with traditional surgical bioprosthetic valves and provide recommendations for clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of TAVI trials and meta-analyses focusing on valve durability and structural valve deterioration (SVD).
- Analysis of reported mechanisms contributing to TAVI valve degeneration, such as leaflet calcification, tear, thrombosis, and stent issues.
- Comparison of long-term SVD rates between TAVI and surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.
Main Results:
- TAVI valves are prone to degeneration through SVD (e.g., leaflet calcification, tear) and non-SVD (e.g., thrombosis, endocarditis).
- Meta-analyses estimate SVD at approximately 7% at 5 years for TAVI valves.
- Traditional surgical bioprosthetic valves show clinically relevant SVD of 6.6% at 10 years, indicating potentially better long-term durability.
Conclusions:
- The long-term durability of TAVI valves is not yet well-defined, posing a challenge for patient selection and management.
- While TAVI technology is improving, its use in younger patients, who may require longer-term valve function, should be approached with caution.
- Further research and standardized definitions for SVD are needed to accurately assess and predict TAVI valve longevity.
More Related Videos
06:59Improved Registration of 3D CT Angiography with X-ray Fluoroscopy for Image Fusion During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: June 3, 2018
09:57Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Guided Valve Sizing for Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement
Published on: January 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Heart Valves
The AV valves prevent the backflow of blood from the ventricles to the atria during ventricular contraction. These valves function with the assistance of the chordae tendineae and papillary muscles. When the ventricles are relaxed, the chordae tendineae are slack, allowing blood to flow from the atria into the...
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Brick Durability, Strength, and Appearance
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction