Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
Published on: October 20, 2023
Results and limits of posterior cranial vault expansion by osteotomy and internal distractors
Federico Di Rocco1, Kenichi Usami1, Tatiana Protzenko1
1Craniofacial Unit, Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France.
Insights
Posterior cranial vault distraction effectively expands the skull in children with craniosynostosis. This surgical technique improves symptoms of increased intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebellar tonsil herniation (TH).
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Pediatric Surgery
- Craniofacial Surgery
Background:
- Posterior cranial vault expansion is a common treatment for complex craniosynostosis.
- Various techniques exist for posterior vault remodeling.
- Posterior vault distraction osteogenesis is an emerging surgical approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the outcomes of posterior vault distraction osteogenesis.
- To evaluate its efficacy in treating craniosynostosis-related complications.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 21 children (mean age 8.6 months) undergoing posterior cranial vault distraction between 2011 and 2014.
- Patients included those with craniofacial syndromes, prior surgeries, elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), and symptomatic cerebellar tonsil herniation (TH).
- Distraction osteogenesis involved placing 2 to 4 distractors, with volumetric analysis via CT scans.
Main Results:
- A mean posterior cranial vault volume increase of 13.9% was observed 117 days post-distraction.
- All patients experienced improvement in symptoms related to elevated ICP or TH.
- Radiological improvement of cerebellar tonsil herniation (TH) was noted in 54% of cases at the last follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Posterior cranial vault distraction is an effective method for enlarging the posterior skull.
- The technique successfully treats elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in pediatric patients.
- It also shows efficacy in managing symptoms associated with cerebellar tonsil herniation (TH).
Background:
Expanding the posterior cranial vault has become a common procedure in the treatment of complex craniosynostosis. Several techniques are available to remodel the posterior vault. Aim of this study was to analyze the posterior vault distraction osteogenesis.
Methods:
Between 2011 and 2014, 21 children (12 boys) were operated on for a posterior distraction of the cranial vault. The mean age was 8.6 months (minimum, 3 months; maximum, 15 years). Thirteen patients presented a craniofacial syndrome. Five had already been operated on (two anterior cranial surgery, two suboccipital decompression, and one craniotomy for sagittal synostosis). Raised intracranial pressure (ICP) was present in 6 patients. Seven patients had symptomatic cerebellar tonsils herniation (TH).
Results:
In 17 children, 2 lateral distractors were placed, in 3 a 3rd medial distractor was placed, and in 1 child 4 distractors were implanted. Volumetric analysis based on computed tomography showed a mean increase of volume of 13.9% 117 days later. After the distraction, symptoms related to raised ICP or TH were improved in all patients, however, radiologically TH was improved at the last follow-up in 54% of the cases.
Conclusion:
Posterior cranial vault distraction is an efficacious technique to enlarge the posterior skull vault and treat increased ICP. Moreover, it appears to be efficacious in treating TH-related symptoms.
Related Concept Videos
Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...
Limiting Reactant
Internal Energy
Internal Receptors
The Number e as a Limit
Types of Limits I

