Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Kidney Regeneration in Adult Zebrafish by Gentamicin Induced Injury
Published on: August 3, 2015
Potential Association of Weight-Based Gentamicin with Increased Acute Kidney Injury in Urologic Prosthetic Surgery
R Hart Moore1, Uzoma A Anele2, Sarah C Krzastek2
1Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Background:
Despite the known nephrotoxicity of gentamicin, in 2008 the American Urological Association recommended a weight-based gentamicin dose of 5 mg/kg for antimicrobial prophylaxis during urologic prosthetic surgery.
Aim:
To identify and characterize rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) in urologic prosthetic surgery, both before and after the implementation of weight-based gentamicin dosing.
Methods:
We performed a single-institution retrospective study of patients receiving perioperative gentamicin during implant, revision, salvage, or explant of inflatable penile prostheses, malleable penile prostheses, or artificial urinary sphincters between the years 2000 and 2017. Patients were stratified into 2 groups, based on administration of either weight-based gentamicin (5 mg/kg or 2-3 mg/kg in cases of poor renal function) or standard-dose gentamicin (80 mg). Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were identified. Patients with available preoperative and postoperative (≤7 days) serum creatinine values were included. AKI was defined by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Comparative analyses were performed between groups.
Main Outcome Measure:
Our primary outcome was incidence of AKI, with secondary outcomes including device infection rate and length of stay.
Results:
Of the 415 urologic prosthetic surgeries performed during the study period, 124 met inclusion criteria with paired preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine values. 57 received weight-based gentamicin (median dose 5.06 mg/kg, interquartile range [IQR] 3.96-5.94) and 67 received standard-dose gentamicin (median dose 1.07 mg/kg, IQR 1.04-1.06), P < .001. There were no significant differences in preoperative renal function or comorbidities between groups; however, the weight-based group was older (median age 64.0 years, IQR 60.0-68.5) compared with the standard-dose group (median age 61.0 years, IQR 55.0-66.0), P = .01, and comprised fewer explant cases (1.8%, 1 of 57) than the standard-dose group (13.4%, 9 of 67), P = .02. The AKI rate was significantly higher in the weight-based group (15.8%, 9 of 57) compared with the standard-dose group (3.0%, 2 o67), P = .02. Device infection rate was similar between groups (5.3%, 3/56 vs 5.2%, 3 of 58), P = 1.00.
Clinical Implications:
Our data suggest weight-based perioperative gentamicin prophylaxis may be associated with an increased AKI risk, without noticeably improving infection rates.
Strength & Limitations:
Strengths of our study include the Veterans Affairs population analyzed, as well as rigorous inclusion criteria that allowed for a sensitive assessment of postoperative renal function. Limitations include the retrospective design and small sample size.
Conclusion:
Weight-based gentamicin dosing may warrant closer perioperative monitoring of renal function, and merits larger investigations to further elucidate risks and benefits. Moore RH, Anele UA, Krzastek SC. Potential Association of Weight-Based Gentamicin with Increased Acute Kidney Injury in Urologic Prosthetic Surgery. J Sex Med 2019;16:137-144.
Insights
Weight-based gentamicin dosing for urologic prosthetic surgery was associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) compared to standard dosing. This approach did not improve infection rates, suggesting closer renal function monitoring is warranted.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Urology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Gentamicin is known for nephrotoxicity.
- The American Urological Association recommended weight-based gentamicin dosing (5 mg/kg) for antimicrobial prophylaxis in urologic prosthetic surgery in 2008.
- This study investigates the impact of this recommendation on acute kidney injury (AKI) rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and characterize rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing urologic prosthetic surgery.
- To compare AKI rates before and after the implementation of weight-based gentamicin dosing.
- To assess the association between weight-based gentamicin prophylaxis and AKI.
Main Methods:
- A single-institution retrospective study was conducted on patients receiving perioperative gentamicin for urologic prosthetic surgery between 2000 and 2017.
- Patients were stratified into two groups: weight-based gentamicin (5 mg/kg or 2-3 mg/kg) and standard-dose gentamicin (80 mg).
- Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria, using paired preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine values.
Main Results:
- Of 124 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 57 received weight-based gentamicin and 67 received standard-dose gentamicin.
- The AKI rate was significantly higher in the weight-based group (15.8%) compared to the standard-dose group (3.0%) (P = .02).
- Device infection rates were similar between the two groups (5.3% vs 5.2%, P = 1.00).
Conclusions:
- Weight-based perioperative gentamicin prophylaxis may be associated with an increased risk of AKI in urologic prosthetic surgery.
- This dosing strategy did not demonstrate a noticeable improvement in infection rates.
- Larger investigations are warranted to further elucidate the risks and benefits, and closer perioperative monitoring of renal function may be advisable.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention

