Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

P50 Sensory Gating in Infants
Published on: December 26, 2013
Differences in means-end exploration between infants at risk for autism and typically developing infants in the first
Sudha M Srinivasan1,2, Anjana N Bhat2,3,4
1IDC School of Design, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Insights
Infants at risk for autism showed less bilateral hand use and poorer problem-solving skills compared to typically developing infants. Object retrieval tasks can help assess and support these developmental skills.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Background:
- Early identification of developmental differences is crucial for timely intervention.
- Means-end exploration is a key developmental milestone reflecting cognitive and motor abilities.
- Infants at risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may exhibit subtle early differences in motor planning and problem-solving.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare means-end exploration skills in infants at risk for autism (AR) and typically developing (TD) infants.
- To investigate age-related changes in motor and cognitive skills within these groups.
- To determine the utility of object retrieval tasks for assessing early developmental abilities.
Main Methods:
- A nested box paradigm was used to assess object retrieval in 16 AR and 16 TD infants at 9, 12, 15, 18, and 24 months.
- Video data analyzed hand bias, completion time, bilateral hand use, problem-solving strategies, and need for assistance.
- Tasks included opening opaque, transparent, and nested boxes.
Main Results:
- No significant group differences were found in hand bias.
- AR infants exhibited significantly lower bilateral hand use and poorer problem-solving skills compared to TD infants.
- AR infants required more tester assistance, indicating challenges in independent task completion.
- Both groups showed age-related improvements in motor and cognitive skills.
Conclusions:
- Means-end exploration tasks reveal differences in bilateral coordination and motor planning in infants at risk for autism.
- Object retrieval tasks are sensitive to early developmental variations and can serve as valuable learning contexts.
- These findings underscore the importance of early assessment of motor and problem-solving skills in infants at risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
Abstract:
Our study compared means-end exploration in infants at risk (AR) for autism and typically developing (TD) infants using a nested box paradigm. Sixteen AR and 16 TD infants were observed at 9, 12, and 15 months with follow-up at 18 and 24 months. We collected video data on three tasks involving retrieval of a small toy by opening (a) an opaque box, (b) a transparent box, and (c) two nested boxes. Dependent variables included hand bias, time to completion, bilateral hand use, problem-solving strategies used, and tester assistance required. There were no group differences in terms of hand biases. Compared to TD infants, AR infants had lower bilateral hand use, poor problem solving skills, and required greater assistance. Both groups demonstrated age-related improvements in motor and cognitive skills. Means-end exploration provides a window into the bilateral coordination and motor planning/problem-solving abilities of young infants at risk for autism. Lastly, object retrieval tasks could serve as important learning contexts for at-risk infants.
More Related Videos
06:07Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
Published on: May 15, 2019
05:35Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
Published on: April 19, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Half-life of a Reaction
The Angiosperm Life Cycle
Characteristics of Life
Typical Model Studies
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.