Public responses to scientific research: Does disciplinary attribution matter?
Christopher P Scheitle1, Sara K Guthrie1
1West Virginia University, USA.
Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)
|December 7, 2018
Summary
Disciplinary attribution did not influence perceptions of a sociology study's scientific merit or trustworthiness. This contrasts with survey data, suggesting longer communications may reduce the impact of disciplinary cues on public attitudes toward science.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Sociology
- Public Perception of Science
Background:
- Science communication effectiveness depends on content and presentation.
- Public perception of scientific research can be influenced by various factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if attributing research to different scientific disciplines affects public perception.
- To determine if the perceived scientific-ness and trustworthiness of a study change based on its disciplinary origin.
Main Methods:
- Two vignette experiments were conducted.
- Participants evaluated a study originating from sociology, with attributions shifted to different social, natural, or medical sciences.
Main Results:
- Attributing the sociology study to other disciplines did not significantly alter its perceived scientific-ness or trustworthiness.
- Null findings contrast with existing survey data showing disciplinary differences in public attitudes.
Conclusions:
- Disciplinary attribution may be a less influential factor in longer science communications compared to brief survey questions.
- Further research is needed to understand the nuances of disciplinary attribution in shaping public views on science.
More Related Videos
08:33A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
7.5K
08:36A Versatile Murine Model of Subcortical White Matter Stroke for the Study of Axonal Degeneration and White Matter Neurobiology
Published on: March 17, 2016
8.5K
Related Concept Videos
03:50The Scientific Method
66.3K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
66.3K
01:32The Scientific Method
266.0K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
266.0K
02:40The Scientific Method
65.2K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
65.2K
02:31Scientific Laws and Theories
88.2K
Scientific Laws
88.2K
00:56Attribution Theory
13.8K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.8K
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K