Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization as a Tool for HPV-Related Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis
Published on: June 14, 2019
Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated
Marc Arbyn1, Sara B Smith2, Sarah Temin3
1Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, J Wytsmanstreet 14, B1050 Brussels, Belgium marc.arbyn@sciensano.be.
High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing on self samples is accurate for detecting cervical cancer precursors when using polymerase chain reaction assays. Self-sampling kits effectively reach underscreened women, but pilot studies are crucial before widespread implementation.
Area of Science:
- Gynecologic Oncology
- Public Health
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Cervical cancer screening aims to detect precancerous lesions using high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing.
- Self-sampling strategies are being explored to improve screening participation, particularly among underscreened populations.
- Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of hrHPV assays on self-collected samples is crucial for clinical implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic accuracy of hrHPV assays performed on self-collected samples compared to clinician-collected samples.
- To determine the effectiveness of various self-sampling strategies in increasing participation among underscreened women.
Main Methods:
- An updated meta-analysis of accuracy studies and participation trials was conducted.
- Included studies compared hrHPV assay performance on self vs. clinician samples for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+).
- Participation review analyzed strategies for engaging underscreened women using self-sampling kits.
Main Results:
- Polymerase chain reaction-based hrHPV assays showed similar sensitivity and specificity on self samples versus clinician samples for detecting CIN2+ or CIN3+.
- Signal amplification-based hrHPV assays demonstrated lower sensitivity on self samples.
- Mailing self-sampling kits directly to women's homes significantly increased participation rates compared to invitations or reminders.
Conclusions:
- hrHPV testing on self samples using polymerase chain reaction assays is a viable and accurate alternative to clinician sampling for cervical cancer screening.
- Proactive distribution of self-sampling kits is an effective strategy for engaging underscreened women in screening programs.
- Careful planning and pilot testing are recommended before large-scale implementation of self-sampling strategies due to potential variability in response rates.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
meta-Directing Deactivators: –NO2, –CN, –CHO, –⁠CO2R, –COR, –CO2H
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
Testes: Histology
The spermatogenic cells, responsible for producing sperm, are...
Complementation Tests
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...
Significance Testing: Overview

