Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

21:24
Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation
Published on: January 2, 2009
24.2K
Evolution of DNA Methylation in Papio Baboons
Tauras P Vilgalys1, Jeffrey Rogers2,3, Clifford J Jolly4,5,6
1Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Molecular Biology and Evolution
|December 7, 2018
Summary
DNA methylation patterns in baboons mirror genetic structure, revealing evolutionary insights. Some DNA methylation sites show signs of positive selection, suggesting a role in adapting to new traits.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Genomics
- Epigenetics
Background:
- Gene regulation is crucial for primate evolution.
- Previous studies focused on gene expression, with limited investigation into regulatory mechanisms and evolutionary forces like drift versus selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate genome-scale DNA methylation divergence across baboon species.
- To understand the role of selection versus drift in shaping DNA methylation patterns.
- To identify functionally relevant genomic regions influenced by DNA methylation changes.
Main Methods:
- Profiling genome-scale DNA methylation in blood samples from five Papio baboon species.
- Analyzing DNA methylation divergence across shallow (0.380 My) and deep (1.4 My) timescales.
- Employing heuristic approaches and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models to detect selection.
Main Results:
- DNA methylation profiles correlate with genetic and geographic structure in baboons.
- Divergence in DNA methylation is faster in unannotated regions and slower in constrained regions like gene exons.
- Evidence of positive selection on DNA methylation levels at specific sites, particularly in promoters, enhancers, and CpG islands.
Conclusions:
- DNA methylation changes largely mirror genetic structure across the baboon genus.
- Specific DNA methylation sites may have been targets of positive selection, linking sequence variation to fitness traits.
- This study provides insights into the evolutionary dynamics of DNA methylation in primates.
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
48.1K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
48.1K
Convergent Evolution
32.9K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
32.9K
Eukaryotic Evolution
41.4K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
41.4K
Synteny and Evolution
3.8K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.8K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
9.1K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
9.1K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
3.4K
3.4K

