Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Ultrasound Tissue Characterization of Human Achilles Tendon by Stability Quantification of Echo Patterns
Published on: September 5, 2025
Results of Reinsertion of the Distal Achilles Tendon
1Zentrum für Sportorthopädie, European SportsCare Network (ESN), Wiesbaden-Nordenstadt.
Background:
Reattachment of the distal Achilles tendon to the posterior calcaneus following distal Achilles tendon tears/avulsions or after excision of large posterior heel spurs is a challenging task for the orthopaedic surgeon.
Patients/Material And Methods:
Between 2005 and the end of 2015, 22 patients who underwent repair/reconstruction of a lesion of the distal Achilles tendon were identified from our electronic records. Calcaneal reinsertions were performed following distal Achilles tendon tears/avulsions (n = 15) or following excision of a large symptomatic posterior heel spur (n = 7). The respective outcome was evaluated comparatively using the VISA-A - G (Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles tendon, German version) questionnaire (100 = maximum). Data were collected preoperatively (n = 11/22), and prospectively at three, six, and 12 months postoperatively (n = 5 - 11/22). Two further retrospective follow-ups were performed 12 - 114 and 21 - 149 months postoperatively (n = 17/22 and 22/22, respectively). All data were analysed retrospectively. Complications were searched from the electronic files.
Results:
Transosseous sutures and different anchor techniques (Panalok®, Corkscrew®, SpeedBridge®) were generally performed. Preoperatively, the VISA-A - G score was 27.3 ± 13.5 (6 - 45) following distal Achilles tendon reinsertions for avulsions and 45.3 ± 49.0 (0 - 100) when reattachment was performed after resection of a large posterior heel spur (p = 0.831). At the final follow-up, VISA-A - G values were 89.4 ± 13.9 (54 - 100) following distal Achilles tendon tear/avulsion and 82.5 ± 24.5 (51 - 100), when Achilles tendons were reattached after posterior heel spur excisions (p = 0.969). There were no complications in the "heel spur group". In the Achilles tendon tear/avulsion group, four out of seven patients with Panalok® repairs developed a fistula. One patient suffered a thromboembolism. None of these complications affected the long-term outcome.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates good long-term outcomes after distal Achilles tendon reinsertion. Knotless double row anchor repair provides a greater area of compression, simplifies and standardises the repair/reconstruction, and provides safety against fistula. These implants are therefore recommended for safe and effective reattachment of the distal Achilles tendon.
More Related Videos
08:19Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Mechanobiology of Tendon Impingement – A Multiaxial Murine Hind Limb Explant Model
Published on: December 8, 2023
07:51Effects of Allogeneic Platelet-Rich Plasma PRP on the Healing Process of Sectioned Achilles Tendons of Rats: A Methodological Description
Published on: March 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
What is the Skeletal System?
The Extracellular Matrix
Transcription Factors
Kidney Structure
Filtration and Urine Formation
Protein Kinases and Phosphatases
Protein kinases
Many proteins in the cell are regulated by phosphorylation, the addition of a phosphate group. A family of enzymes called kinases...