Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Glioblastoma Relapse Post-Resection Model for Therapeutic Hydrogel Investigations
Published on: February 24, 2023
Regorafenib compared with lomustine in patients with relapsed glioblastoma (REGOMA): a multicentre, open-label,
Giuseppe Lombardi1, Gian Luca De Salvo2, Alba Ariela Brandes3
1Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Background:
Glioblastoma is a highly vascularised tumour and there are few treatment options after disease recurrence. Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic, stromal, and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma.
Methods:
REGOMA is a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 2 trial done in ten centres in Italy. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed glioblastoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and documented disease progression after surgery followed by radiotherapy and temozolomide chemoradiotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) by a web-based system, stratified by centre and surgery at recurrence (yes vs no), to receive regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle or lomustine 110 mg/m2 once every 6 weeks until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02926222, and is currently in follow-up.
Findings:
Between Nov 27, 2015, and Feb 23, 2017, 124 patients were screened and 119 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive regorafenib (n=59) or lomustine (n=60). Median follow-up was 15·4 months (IQR 13·8-18·1). At the analysis cutoff date, 99 (83%) of 119 patients had died: 42 (71%) of 59 in the regorafenib group and 57 (95%) of 60 in the lomustine group. Overall survival was significantly improved in the regorafenib group compared with the lomustine group, with a median overall survival of 7·4 months (95% CI 5·8-12·0) in the regorafenib group and 5·6 months (4·7-7·3) in the lomustine group (hazard ratio 0·50, 95% CI 0·33-0·75; log-rank p=0·0009). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33 (56%) of 59 patients treated with regorafenib and 24 (40%) of 60 with lomustine. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to regorafenib were hand-foot skin reaction, increased lipase, and blood bilirubin increased (in six [10%] of 59 patients each). In the lomustine group, the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were decreased platelet count (eight [13%] of 60 patients), decreased lymphocyte count (eight [13%]), and neutropenia (seven [12%]). No death was considered by the investigators to be drug related.
Interpretation:
REGOMA showed an encouraging overall survival benefit of regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma. This drug might be a new potential treatment for these patients and should be investigated in an adequately powered phase 3 study.
Funding:
Veneto Institute of Oncology and Bayer Italy.
Insights
Regorafenib significantly improved overall survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma compared to lomustine. This oral multikinase inhibitor shows promise as a new treatment option for glioblastoma patients with limited alternatives.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Medical oncology
- Clinical trials
Background:
- Glioblastoma is a highly vascularized brain tumor with limited treatment options upon recurrence.
- Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, targets angiogenic, stromal, and oncogenic pathways.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib versus lomustine in treating recurrent glioblastoma.
- To evaluate overall survival as the primary endpoint in the REGOMA phase 2 trial.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, multicenter, open-label phase 2 trial (REGOMA) involving 119 patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
- Patients were assigned to receive regorafenib (160 mg daily for 3 weeks of 4-week cycles) or lomustine (110 mg/m² every 6 weeks).
- Stratification by center and prior surgery at recurrence, with intention-to-treat analysis for overall survival.
Main Results:
- Regorafenib demonstrated a significant overall survival benefit over lomustine (median 7.4 vs. 5.6 months; HR 0.50, p=0.0009).
- Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 56% of regorafenib patients and 40% of lomustine patients.
- Most common regorafenib adverse events included hand-foot skin reaction, increased lipase, and elevated bilirubin.
Conclusions:
- Regorafenib offers an encouraging overall survival benefit for recurrent glioblastoma patients.
- This study suggests regorafenib as a potential new treatment for recurrent glioblastoma.
- Further investigation in a phase 3 study is warranted to confirm these findings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Phase-lead and Phase-lag Controllers
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

