Regorafenib compared with lomustine in patients with relapsed glioblastoma (REGOMA): a multicentre, open-label,

Giuseppe Lombardi1, Gian Luca De Salvo2, Alba Ariela Brandes3

  • 1Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.

The Lancet. Oncology
|December 8, 2018
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Regorafenib significantly improved overall survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma compared to lomustine. This oral multikinase inhibitor shows promise as a new treatment option for glioblastoma patients with limited alternatives.

Area of Science:

  • Neuro-oncology
  • Medical oncology
  • Clinical trials

Background:

  • Glioblastoma is a highly vascularized brain tumor with limited treatment options upon recurrence.
  • Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, targets angiogenic, stromal, and oncogenic pathways.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib versus lomustine in treating recurrent glioblastoma.
  • To evaluate overall survival as the primary endpoint in the REGOMA phase 2 trial.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized, multicenter, open-label phase 2 trial (REGOMA) involving 119 patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
  • Patients were assigned to receive regorafenib (160 mg daily for 3 weeks of 4-week cycles) or lomustine (110 mg/m² every 6 weeks).
  • Stratification by center and prior surgery at recurrence, with intention-to-treat analysis for overall survival.

Main Results:

  • Regorafenib demonstrated a significant overall survival benefit over lomustine (median 7.4 vs. 5.6 months; HR 0.50, p=0.0009).
  • Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 56% of regorafenib patients and 40% of lomustine patients.
  • Most common regorafenib adverse events included hand-foot skin reaction, increased lipase, and elevated bilirubin.

Conclusions:

  • Regorafenib offers an encouraging overall survival benefit for recurrent glioblastoma patients.
  • This study suggests regorafenib as a potential new treatment for recurrent glioblastoma.
  • Further investigation in a phase 3 study is warranted to confirm these findings.

Related Concept Videos

Phase-lead and Phase-lag Controllers01:22

Phase-lead and Phase-lag Controllers

Understanding the working function of different types of controllers can be illustrated with practical analogies, such as adjusting a stereo's volume equalizer. Cranking up the bass involves a phase-lead controller, which functions as a high-pass filter, while increasing the treble uses a phase-lag controller, which acts as a low-pass filter. PD controllers, similar to high-pass filters, enhance the system's response to high-frequency components. PI controllers, akin to low-pass...
546
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control01:24

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control

Phase-lead controllers are commonly used in various control systems to enhance response speed and stability. Adjusting the brightness on a television screen offers a practical example of phase-lead control. When contrast is enhanced, a phase-lead controller is employed. Mathematically, phase-lead control is identified when the first parameter is smaller than the second.
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
454
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control01:21

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control

Phase-lag controllers are widely used in control systems to improve stability and reduce steady-state errors. A dimmer switch controlling the brightness of a light bulb serves as a practical example of phase-lag control, gradually adjusting the bulb's brightness. Mathematically, phase-lag control or low-pass filtering is represented when the factor 'a' is less than 1.
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...
421
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.9K
Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light...
411
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.5K