Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
What Does the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire Really Measure? The Importance of Context in Evaluating
Anna Zajenkowska1, Monika Prusik2, Michał Szulawski1
1Department of Psychology, Maria Grzegorzewska University, Warsaw, Poland.
Abstract:
We examine the psychometric validity of the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ) by applying confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Previous analysis of psychometric features of the AIHQ showed problems with internal consistency and stability of the tool over time. By using CFA we wanted to check whether the scenes depicted in the questionnaire actually measure the same construct and whether the subscale measures are intercorrelated. The analysis included ambivalent scenes and was conducted on offenders (N = 108) and the general population (N = 161). Results indicated that the structure proposed by the AIHQ authors differs from that revealed by the statistical procedures. It appears that the AIHQ factor structure is centered on situational contexts rather than on particular questions measuring constructs of hostility and blame. We discuss these findings with regard to application of the AIHQ in clinical samples.
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Hindsight Biases
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Self Within Cultural Contexts
Correspondence Bias
Self-Serving Bias

