Incidence and Associated Factors of Chronic Pain After Caesarean Section: A Systematic Review

Hailu Yimer1, Haile Woldie2

  • 1Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal D'Obstetrique Et Gynecologie Du Canada : JOGC
|December 12, 2018
PubMed

The number of Caesarean section (CS) procedures has increased dramatically both in developed and developing countries in recent decades. CS has been associated with chronic pain. A vicious impediment on quality of life may occur among women who experience chronic post-CS pain (CPCSP). Therefore, this systematic review aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the incidence of chronic pain after Caesarean delivery and the possible risk factors for the development of chronic pain. The PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched for articles published in English between 2004 and January 2017 using appropriate terms. Studies that examined the incidence of chronic pain after CS as their primary outcome measure, and follow-up period of more than 2 months was selected. Both authors searched and reviewed the studies for eligibility and extracted the data in predefined forms. We also conducted a hand search of the reference lists of included articles. Findings from the reviewed studies are summarized using narrative and tables. Of the 4932 records, 17 studies met the review eligibility criteria. This review found that the incidence of CPCSP varies among studies and is influenced by preoperative patient factors and surgical- and anaesthetic-related factors. Of the reviewed studies, the majority were examined for chronic pain at 3 months after CS. The incidence of CPCSP after 2 to less than 6 months was found to range between 4% and 41.8%. The reported factors that influence CPCSP were inconsistent among studies. Despite this, the presence of a higher intensity of pain on postoperative day 1 was the most commonly identified factor associated with CPCSP. This systematic review found a clinically important incidence of CPCSP, ranging from 4% to 41.8% at 2 to less than 6 months after CS. Moreover, the evidence demonstrates that severe acute postoperative pain after CS is an important contributing factor for the development of CPCSP. However, no strong evidence-based conclusions and recommendations may be drawn from the evidence. Future well-designed studies with a longer follow-up period are needed to identify the most important perioperative factors associated with chronic pain following Caesarean delivery.

Related Concept Videos

Prevalence and Incidence01:08

Prevalence and Incidence

In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
1.9K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.3K
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report01:21

Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report

An Incident or Occurrence Report in a healthcare setting is a crucial document used to record any unexpected occurrence that may or may not have affected a patient, employee, or visitor. Such reports are critical to improving patient safety and include all details leading up to and including the event.
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
1.3K