Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
The Optimal Plasma Volume Status in Heart Failure in Relation to Clinical Outcome
Pieter Martens1, Petra Nijst2, Matthias Dupont2
1Department of Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium; Doctoral School for Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Background:
Progressive plasma volume (PV) expansion is a hallmark of chronic heart failure (HF), ultimately contributing to decompensated heart failure. Monitoring PV might offer prognostic information and might be a target for tailored therapy.
Methods And Results:
The correlation between technetium-99 (99Tc)-labeled red blood cell measured PV and calculated PV was first determined in a validation cohort. The relationship between PV status (PVS; a marker how much actual PV deviated from the ideal PV) and outcome was analyzed with the use of Cox proportional modeling in a prospective chronic HF (CHF) population (the outcome cohort). Thirty-one HF patients were included in the validation cohort. Calculated PV correlated well with 99Tc-measured PV (r = 0.714; P = .001). A total of 1173 patients (HF with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]: n = 872; HF with mid-range EF [HFmrEF]: n = 229; HF with preserved EF [HFpEF]: n = 72) were prospectively included in the outcome cohort. The mean PVS in the outcome cohort was -6.7% ± 10%, indicating slight PV contraction. Higher PVS was independently associated with increased risk for HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.016; 95% confidence interval 1.006-1.027 per 1% increase in PVS; P = .002). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that a PVS of -6.5% optimally predicted absence of adverse outcome. Hazard ratio analysis indicated that CHF patients were less equipped in tolerating PV expansion in comparison to PV contraction. The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were independently associated with a higher odds of having an optimal PVS in HFrEF and HFmrEF (all P < .05), but not in HFpEF.
Conclusions:
Calculated PV correlates well with measured PV in HF patients. An increase in PV is independently associated with a higher risk of adverse outcome, and a slight contraction of the predicted PV seems to be related to less adverse events. Higher dosages of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockers are associated with higher odds of having an optimal PV status.
More Related Videos
07:49Author Spotlight: Investigating HR-Dependent Cardiac Function in Mouse Models Through a Novel Atrial-Pacing Approach
Published on: July 21, 2023
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics