Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Culture of Bladder Cancer Organoids as Precision Medicine Tools
Published on: December 28, 2021
Is neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pT2 bladder cancer associated with a survival benefit in a population-based analysis?
Elio Mazzone1, Sophie Knipper2, Francesco A Mistretta3
1Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Background:
Patients with organ confined muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are candidates for radical cystectomy (RC) should receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHT). However, the most contemporary CHT use rates indicate low adherence to these guidelines. We tested contemporary neoadjuvant CHT rates and associated cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in pT2N0 MIBC patients treated with RC.
Materials And Methods:
Within the SEER database (2004-2015), we identified patients with pT2N0 MIBC patients who underwent RC. CHT administration rates were evaluated using estimated annual percentage changes (EAPCs) analyses. After inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses and Cox regression models (CRMs) were used to test the effect of CHT vs no CHT on survival. Landmark analyses tested for immortal time bias.
Results:
Of 3978 RC patients, 38.2% of patients received CHT. Between 2004 and 2015, CHT rates increased from 15.9% to 66.2% (EAPC: +14.2%; p < 0.001). IPTW-adjusted KM showed 10-year CSM-free survival rates of 78.9% for CHT vs 76.7% for no CHT patients (p = 0.6). Similarly, IPTW-adjusted KM showed 10-year OM-free survival rates of 54.6% for CHT vs 57.9% for no CHT patients (p = 0.8). In IPTW-adjusted MCRMs, CHT was not significantly associated with lower CSM (HR 0.97, CI 0.82-1.14; p = 0.7) or OM (HR 1.02, CI 0.90-1.16; p = 0.7). Virtually the same CSM and OM rates were recorded after landmark analyses.
Conclusions:
CHT use in pT2N0 MIBC RC patients sharply increased over the study span. However, neoadjuvant CHT was not associated with better survival in this patient group.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Conservation of Small Populations

