Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
Published on: November 27, 2019
GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence
Romina Brignardello-Petersen1, Reem A Mustafa2, Reed A C Siemieniuk1
1Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8, Canada.
This guidance addresses incoherence in network meta-analysis, explaining its causes and how to judge its impact on evidence certainty using the GRADE framework.
Area of Science:
- Medical Research Methodology
- Evidence Synthesis
- Health Technology Assessment
Background:
- Network meta-analysis (NMA) synthesizes evidence from multiple treatment comparisons.
- Assessing the certainty of evidence in NMA is crucial for decision-making.
- Incoherence, or inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence, poses a challenge in NMA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide official guidance on addressing incoherence in NMA.
- To clarify the role of incoherence in GRADE certainty assessments.
- To offer practical strategies for reviewers evaluating NMA.
Main Methods:
- The article outlines the Grading of Recommendations Assessments, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
- It details potential sources of incoherence, including bias, indirectness, and intransitivity.
- Guidance is provided on judging the impact of incoherence on the network estimate.
Main Results:
- Incoherence arises from significant discrepancies between direct and indirect treatment effect estimates.
- Potential causes include study design limitations, publication bias, indirectness, and intransitivity.
- Judicious assessment of incoherence's impact is necessary to avoid unwarranted downgrades in evidence certainty.
Conclusions:
- Addressing incoherence requires careful judgment regarding its impact on the overall network estimate.
- Reviewers must be vigilant against over-downgrading evidence certainty due to incoherence and related GRADE domains.
- The article provides a framework for consistent and accurate certainty assessments in NMA.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Sieve Analysis and Grading Curves
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Graded Potential
Graded potentials fall into two categories: depolarizing and hyperpolarizing. Depolarizing graded potentials typically occur when sodium (Na+) or...
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Types of Aggregate Grading
Well-graded aggregates include a complete range of necessary size fractions that fit together to create a dense matrix with minimal voids, represented by a smooth, continuous gradation curve. This type of grading ensures good...

