Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026
Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
Isotope-labeled versus analog internal standard in LC-MS/MS method for tacrolimus determination in human whole blood
Magdalena Bodnar-Broniarczyk1, Tomasz Pawiński1, Paweł K Kunicki2
1Department of Drug Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Abstract:
The aim of this work was to develop and to validate LC-MS/MS method for tacrolimus (TAC) determination in whole blood samples using two different types of internal standards (IS): an isotope-labeled TAC13C,D2 and a structural analog ascomycin (ASC). Matrix effects (ME) were evaluated to determine their influence on validation parameters. The LC-MS/MS analyses were performed using a 4000 QTRAP® mass spectrometer (AB Sciex) coupled to a HPLC 1260 Infinity system (Agilent Technologies). The [M + NH4]+ adducts were monitored with mass transitions of: 821.5 → 768.4 m/z for TAC, 809.5 → 756.4 m/z for ASC, and 824.6 → 771.5 m/z for TAC13C,D2. Blood samples were treated with 0.1 mol/L zinc sulfate - acetonitrile (50:50, v/v) then extracted with tert-butyl methyl ether. ME evaluations were performed by preextraction addition (n = 6), postextraction addition (n = 8), and repeated measures (n = 8) of reference solutions, separately for both ISs. ME, absolute recovery (AR) and process efficiency (PE) were calculated. Low (1.5 ng/mL) and high (16 ng/mL) TAC concentrations were tested. The method was successfully calibrated in a range of: 0.5-20 ng/mL. Both ISs provided satisfactory imprecision (<3.09% and <3.63% for TAC13C,D2 and ASC, respectively) and accuracy (99.55-100.63% and 97.35-101.71% for TAC13C,D2 and ASC, respectively). Similar ARs were found for all three compounds yielding: 74.89-76.36% for TAC, 78.37% for TAC13C,D2 and 75.66% for ASC. Significant ME were observed yielding on the average: -16.04% and -29.07% for TAC, -16.64% for TAC13C,D2 and -28.41% for ASC. Consequently, PE was 64.11% and 53.12% for TAC, 65.35% for TAC13C,D2 and 54.18% for ASC. ME for TAC were perfectly compensated (TAC/IS ratio) in each sample resulting in mean percent value of: 0.89% and -0.97% for TAC13C,D2 and ASC, respectively. An IS ascomycin presented a performance equivalent to TAC13C,D2 in LC-MS/MS method developed for TAC monitoring.
Related Concept Videos
01:12Isotopes
An element's atomic mass, or weight,...
02:31Elements: Chemical Symbols and Isotopes
Some symbols are derived from the common English name of the element; others are abbreviations of the name in another language — Latin, Greek or German. For example, the symbol for aluminum (common name)...
02:50Dosage Compensation
In addition to sexual development, the X chromosome has genes involved in autosomal functions such as brain development and the immune system. Therefore, males and females with distinct numbers of X chromosomes will...
01:28Compensation Mechanisms
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
01:17Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...
01:18Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...