Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Review of Ultrasound Parameters for Predicting Difficult Airways
Published on: April 7, 2023
Instruments to Measure Outcomes in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
Marie Friedel1,2, Isabelle Aujoulat3, Anne-Catherine Dubois3
1Institute of Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; marie.friedel@uclouvain.be.
Insights
Measuring the impact of pediatric palliative care (PPC) is challenging. Few instruments adequately assess PPC outcomes, and children are rarely involved in reporting their own results.
Area of Science:
- Palliative Care
- Pediatric Health
- Quality of Life Measurement
Background:
- Pediatric palliative care (PPC) aims to enhance quality of life for children using a family-centered approach.
- Measuring the multidimensional outcomes of PPC remains a significant challenge in clinical practice and research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and evaluate the measurement instruments used to assess the impact of pediatric palliative care interventions.
- To identify the range of outcomes and psychometric properties of instruments applied in PPC research.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive search was conducted across five major databases: Embase, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, PsychInfo, and Medline.
- Inclusion criteria focused on studies defining PPC, involving patients aged 0-18 years, life-limiting diseases, empirical data, and combined intervention-outcome-measurement descriptions.
- Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent researchers using the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria checklist.
Main Results:
- Nineteen of 2150 reviewed articles met the eligibility criteria, with 15 employing quantitative methods and 9 deemed of moderate quality.
- Key multidimensional outcomes assessed included quality of life, spiritual well-being, satisfaction, social support, and family involvement.
- Only 15 of 23 reported instruments demonstrated some psychometric properties, and a mere 5 included child-reported outcome measures.
Conclusions:
- There is a scarcity of data regarding the psychometric properties of instruments used in pediatric palliative care.
- Children's perspectives and outcomes are not systematically incorporated into the assessment of PPC interventions.
- Further development and validation of measurement tools are needed to accurately capture the impact of PPC on children and their families.
Context:
Pediatric palliative care (PPC) is intended to promote children's quality of life by using a family-centered approach. However, the measurement of this multidimensional outcome remains challenging.
Objective:
To review the instruments used to assess the impact of PPC interventions.
Data Sources:
Five databases (Embase, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, PsychInfo, Medline) were searched.
Study Selection:
Inclusion criteria were as follows: definition of PPC used; patients aged 0 to 18 years; diseases listed in the directory of life-limiting diseases; results based on empirical data; and combined descriptions of a PPC intervention, its outcomes, and a measurement instrument.
Data Extraction:
Full-text articles were assessed and data were extracted by 2 independent researchers, and each discrepancy was resolved through consensus. The quality of the studies was assessed by using the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers From a Variety of Fields checklist.
Results:
Nineteen of 2150 articles met the eligibility criteria. Researchers in 15 used quantitative methods, and 9 were of moderate quality. Multidimensional outcomes included health-related quality of life, spiritual well-being, satisfaction with care and/or communication, perceived social support, and family involvement in treatment or place-of-care preferences. PPC interventions ranged from home-based to hospital and respite care. Only 15 instruments (of 23 reported) revealed some psychometric properties, and only 5 included patient-reported (child) outcome measures.
Limitations:
We had no access to the developmental process of the instruments used to present the underlying concepts that were underpinning the constructs.
Conclusions:
Data on the psychometric properties of instruments used to assess the impact of PPC interventions were scarce. Children are not systematically involved in reporting outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Instrumentation Amplifier
To overcome this challenge, an ECG machine utilizes an instrumentation amplifier. This specialized amplifier is...

