Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models01:14

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models

557
Compartmental analysis is a widely adopted approach to characterizing drug pharmacokinetics. It uses compartment models that conceptualize the body as a collection of reversibly communicating compartments, each representing a group of tissues exhibiting similar drug distribution characteristics. The movement rate of the drug between these compartments is typically described by first-order kinetics.
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
557
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models01:15

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models

274
Physiological models in pharmacokinetics are instrumental in understanding the distribution and elimination of drugs within the body. These models describe the drug concentration within target organs, influenced by factors such as drug uptake, tissue volume, and blood flow. Drug uptake is governed by the partition coefficient, which signifies the drug concentration ratio in tissue to that in the blood. The blood flow rate to a specific tissue is expressed as Qt, and the rate of change in tissue...
274
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

249
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
249
Mathematical Modeling: Problem Solving01:29

Mathematical Modeling: Problem Solving

361
Mathematical modeling transforms real-world scenarios into mathematical expressions, allowing for structured problem-solving and analysis. This process involves defining the situation, assigning variables to measurable quantities, selecting an appropriate model, and solving the resulting equation. Such models are invaluable in finance, providing precise methods to evaluate investments, loans, and repayment structures.A widely used example is the calculation of fixed monthly payments on a loan,...
361
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches01:14

Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches

535
Drug disposition in the body is a complex process and can be studied using two major approaches: the model and the model-independent approaches.
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
535
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis00:59

Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis

329
Noncompartmental analyses offer an alternative method for describing drug pharmacokinetics without relying on a specific compartmental model. In this approach, the drug's pharmacokinetics are assumed to be linear, with the terminal phase log-linear. This assumption allows for simplified analysis and interpretation of the drug's behavior in the body.
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
329

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fibronectin-induced overactivation of α<sub>V</sub>β<sub>3</sub>-PI3K-PIP3-PDK1-ILK signaling drives aortic disease in Marfan syndrome.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Sex-specific differences in clinical characteristics and organ damage in Hypertensive Urgencies.

Internal and emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Psychological Burden in Uncontrolled Hypertension: Findings from the ERIDANO Multicenter Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Thrombus and Aortic Wall <sup>18</sup>F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Uptake in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology·2026
Same author

Sleep disorders in children with Cri du Chat syndrome: A questionnaire-based study.

Sleep medicine·2026
Same author

Aortic Valve Phenotype Shapes Helical Flow in the Ascending Aorta: Insights from 4D Flow MRI.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
06:51

Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research

Published on: October 20, 2023

1.7K

Multiscale mathematical modeling vs. the generalized transfer function approach for aortic pressure estimation: a

Andrea Guala1, Francesco Tosello2, Dario Leone2

  • 1Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain. andrea.guala@yahoo.com.

Hypertension Research : Official Journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension
|December 12, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Non-invasive methods, including a mathematical model and generalized transfer function (GTF), did not significantly outperform brachial blood pressure in estimating aortic pressure. Further research is needed to improve mathematical modeling and understand GTF limitations in specific patient groups.

Keywords:
Aortic pressureGeneralized transfer functionHypertensionMathematical modelingPulse pressure amplification

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation
08:47

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation

Published on: February 9, 2024

2.1K
Multiscale Structures Aggregated by Imprinted Nanofibers for Functional Surfaces
06:14

Multiscale Structures Aggregated by Imprinted Nanofibers for Functional Surfaces

Published on: September 11, 2018

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
06:51

Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research

Published on: October 20, 2023

1.7K
Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation
08:47

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation

Published on: February 9, 2024

2.1K
Multiscale Structures Aggregated by Imprinted Nanofibers for Functional Surfaces
06:14

Multiscale Structures Aggregated by Imprinted Nanofibers for Functional Surfaces

Published on: September 11, 2018

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Physiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of central aortic pressure is crucial for cardiovascular risk assessment and management.
  • Non-invasive techniques are desirable alternatives to invasive pressure measurements.
  • Current non-invasive methods, such as the generalized transfer function (GTF) and mathematical modeling, require further validation against invasive measurements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of a mathematical model and the GTF method for estimating aortic pressure compared to invasive measurements.
  • To investigate the factors influencing the errors of these non-invasive techniques, including brachial pressure errors, pressure waveform changes, and patient characteristics.
  • To compare the accuracy of non-invasive methods with standard oscillometric brachial blood pressure measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Sixty-two patients undergoing invasive hemodynamic evaluation were enrolled.
  • Simultaneous measurements of invasive aortic pressure, brachial pressure, and radial tonometric waveform were recorded.
  • A mathematical model and a GTF device were used to estimate aortic pressure from the recorded waveforms.
  • Radial invasive pressure was measured post-aortic pressure recording for comparison.

Main Results:

  • Neither the mathematical model nor the GTF method significantly outperformed oscillometric brachial blood pressure in estimating aortic pressure.
  • Bland-Altman analysis indicated a tendency for overestimation of pressure with increasing absolute values, except for diastolic estimations by the mathematical model.
  • GTF errors correlated with pulse pressure amplification variability and brachial pressure errors, while mathematical model errors were linked to demographic and clinical factors.

Conclusions:

  • Current non-invasive methods, including the evaluated mathematical model and GTF, do not substantially improve upon brachial blood pressure for aortic pressure estimation.
  • Mathematical modeling requires enhancement with patient-specific factors.
  • Variability in pulse pressure amplification may limit the GTF method's accuracy, particularly in patients at risk for coronary artery disease.