Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Surgical risk stratification based on preoperative risk factors in adult spinal deformity
Mitsuru Yagi1, Naobumi Hosogane2, Nobuyuki Fujita3
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio UniversitySchool of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Murayama Medical Center, 2 Chome-37-༑ Gakuen, Musashimurayama, Tokyo 208-0011, Japan; Keio Spine Research Group, 178-4-4 Wakashiba, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0871, Japan.
Background Context:
Corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) improves health-related quality of life but has high complication rates. Predicting a patient's risk of perioperative and late postoperative complications is difficult, although several potential risk factors have been reported.
Purpose:
To establish an accurate, ASD-specific model for predicting the risk of postoperative complications, based on baseline demographic, radiographic, and surgical invasiveness data in a retrospective case series.
Study Design/Setting:
Multicentered retrospective review and the surgical risk stratification.
Patient Sample:
One hundred fifty-one surgically treated ASD at our hospital for risk analysis and model building and 89 surgically treated ASD at 2 other our hospitals for model validation.
Outcome Measures:
HRQoL measures and surgical complications.
Methods:
We analyzed demographic and medical data, including complications, for 151 adults with ASD who underwent surgery at our hospital and were followed for at least 2years. Each surgical risk factor identified by univariate analyses was assigned a value based on its odds ratio, and the values of all risk factors were summed to obtain a surgical risk score (range 0-20). We stratified risk scores into grades (A-D) and analyzed their correlations with complications. We validated the model using data from 89 patients who underwent ASD surgery at two other hospitals.
Results:
Complications developed in 48% of the patients in the model-building cohort. Univariate analyses identified 10 demographic, physical, and surgical risk indicators, with odds ratios from 5.4 to 1.4, for complications. Our risk-grading system showed good calibration and discrimination in the validation cohort. The complication rate increased with and correlated well with the risk grade using receiver operating characteristic curves.
Conclusions:
This simple, ASD-specific model uses readily accessible indicators to predict a patient's risk of perioperative and postoperative complications and can help surgeons adjust treatment strategies for best outcomes in high-risk patients.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Relative Risk
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Plastic Deformations
Plastic Deformations
Temperature Dependent Deformation

