VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF A NEW TRIAGE SYSTEM FOR PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE: CLARIPED
Maria Clara de Magalhães-Barbosa1, Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa1, Carlos Eduardo Raymundo1
1Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Insights
The CLARIPED triage system demonstrates strong validity and reliability for pediatric emergency care. This Brazilian system accurately assesses urgency, improving resource allocation and patient outcomes in emergency departments.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Pediatric Care
- Healthcare Systems
Background:
- Pediatric emergency departments (EDs) require efficient triage systems to manage patient flow and ensure timely care.
- The CLARIPED system was developed in Brazil to address the need for a validated pediatric triage tool.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity and reliability of the CLARIPED triage system for pediatric emergency care.
- To assess the association between CLARIPED urgency levels and clinical outcomes.
- To compare CLARIPED performance against a reference standard.
Main Methods:
- A prospective observational study assessed validity in 1,416 pediatric ED visits.
- Urgency levels were correlated with resource utilization, admission rates, hospitalization, and ED length of stay.
- Inter-rater reliability was determined through double-triage by nurses in 191 patients.
Main Results:
- CLARIPED urgency levels significantly correlated with decreased resource use, admission rates, and length of stay.
- Sensitivity for high urgency was 0.89 (95% CI 0.78-0.95) with an undertriage rate of 7.4%.
- Substantial inter-rater reliability was observed (quadratic weighted kappa = 0.75).
Conclusions:
- The CLARIPED system exhibits good validity in assessing pediatric emergency care needs.
- The CLARIPED system demonstrates substantial reliability among healthcare professionals.
- CLARIPED is a suitable triage tool for pediatric emergency departments.
Objective:
To assess the validity and reliability of a triage system for pediatric emergency care (CLARIPED) developed in Brazil.
Methods:
Validity phase: prospective observational study with children aged 0 to 15 years who consecutively visited the pediatric emergency department (ED) of a tertiary hospital from July 2 to 18, 2013. We evaluated the association of urgency levels with clinical outcomes (resource utilization, ED admission rate, hospitalization rate, and ED length of stay); and compared the CLARIPED performance to a reference standard. Inter-rater reliability phase: a convenience sample of patients who visited the pediatric ED between April and July 2013 was consecutively and independently double triaged by two nurses, and the quadratic weighted kappa was estimated.
Results:
In the validity phase, the distribution of urgency levels in 1,416 visits was the following: 0.0% red (emergency); 5.9% orange (high urgency); 40.5% yellow (urgency); 50.6% green (low urgency); and 3.0% blue (no urgency). The percentage of patients who used two or more resources decreased from the orange level to the yellow, green, and blue levels (81%, 49%, 22%, and 2%, respectively, p<0.0001), as did the ED admission rate, ED length of stay, and hospitalization rate. The sensitivity to identify patients with high urgency level was 0.89 (confidence interval of 95% [95%CI] 0.78-0.95), and the undertriage rate was 7.4%. The inter-rater reliability in 191patients classified by two nurses was substantial (kw2=0.75; 95%CI 0.74-0.79).
Conclusions:
The CLARIPED system showed good validity and substantial reliability for triage in a pediatric emergency department.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Emerging Adulthood
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Distribution Reliability and Automation
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...


