A comparison of methods to derive aggregated transfer factors using wild boar data from the Fukushima Prefecture
Donovan Anderson1, Kei Okuda2, Ann Hess3
1Institute of Environmental Radioactivity, Fukushima University, 960-1248, Fukushima Prefecture, Fukushima, Kanayagawa, Japan.
Abstract:
Aggregated transfer factors (Tag; m2 kg-1) are often used to predict radionuclide activity concentrations in biota (Bq kg-1) from soil contamination levels (Bq m-2). Inherently large uncertainties in Tag values severely limit their predictive power. Many published Tag values have been derived from radionuclide deposition onto soil following weapons fallout, or the accidents at Chernobyl and Fukushima. In many cases the soil data used to derive a Tag value were collected for other purposes, and the spatial resolution of the soil data is much less than that of the biota data to which it is paired. We hypothesized that this disassociation and imprecision in paring deposition density and biota data may contribute to the large variations observed in Tag values. We tested the hypothesis by deriving Tag values for Japanese wild boar in two ways. One method used paired deposition density-biota contamination levels, with the soil data collected from each boar trap site. The second method used a soil radioactivity density map, of relatively low spatial resolution, generated by the Japanese government agency MEXT for fallout from the Fukushima accident. We hypothesized that Tag values derived from the method using paired deposition density-wild boar data would have less variation. Initial statistical test suggested significant differences in the predictive power of the two methods. However, removal of suspected outliers in the MEXT data set decreased the statistical differences and indicated that collecting 137Cs soil deposition density measurements in the field did not reduce the large variation in our Tag values. More importantly, both methods revealed that soil contamination levels are a poor predictor of radiocesium concentrations in boar (r2 < 0.23). The inadequacies of Tag to predict wild boar 137Cs concentrations is an ominous indication of the lack of applicability of the Tag model as a rigorous research parameter. Tag values are best suited for their original intended purpose: upper tier, screening level computations. Further studies on how to reduce uncertainty when predicting 137Cs concentrations in biota are needed to thoroughly understand the transfer of radiocesium within the environment.
Related Concept Videos
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA
One-way ANOVA is applied when a single independent variable or factor is scrutinized. It compares...
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Transcription Factors


