Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
David Moher1,2
1Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus, 501 Smyth Rd, Room L1288, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada. dmoher@ohri.ca.
High-quality biomedical research is crucial for patient care. Despite numerous reporting guidelines, poor reporting persists, necessitating improved implementation and auditing for better accuracy and transparency.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical research and scientific publishing ethics.
Background:
- Editors have a responsibility to ensure high-quality research publication.
- Poor reporting in biomedical research negatively impacts patient care and scientific integrity.
- Reporting guidelines aim to enhance accuracy, clarity, and transparency in publications.
Discussion:
- Hundreds of reporting guidelines exist, with some journals endorsing or implementing them.
- Despite guideline availability, biomedical research reporting remains suboptimal.
- Challenges in implementing and adhering to reporting guidelines persist.
Key Insights:
- Electronic algorithms and integrated tools are being developed to aid guideline selection and editorial processes.
- Universities should evaluate the societal value of poorly reported research when considering faculty advancement.
- Journal auditing of published article quality can provide valuable feedback for improvement.
Outlook:
- Further integration of technological solutions for guideline adherence is anticipated.
- A shift towards valuing well-reported research in academic career progression is needed.
- Journal auditing could become a standard practice for enhancing publication quality.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Guidelines for Sketching a Curve
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Data Reporting and Recording

