Similarities and Differences Between Staphylococcal and Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndromes in Children: Results From

Etienne Javouhey1,2, Pierre-Adrien Bolze3, Claire Jamen1

  • 1Pediatric Emergency and Critical Care Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Bron, France.

Frontiers in Pediatrics
|December 15, 2018
PubMed

Insights

Comparing staphylococcal and streptococcal toxic shock syndromes (TSS) in children reveals distinct clinical signs and origins. Streptococcal TSS showed more severe organ dysfunction and higher mortality risk, highlighting the need for early diagnosis and specific treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Infectious Diseases
  • Toxicology
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Toxic shock syndromes (TSS) are severe, life-threatening conditions caused by staphylococcal or streptococcal infections.
  • Early recognition and specific treatments are critical for improving outcomes in pediatric TSS cases.
  • Understanding differences between staphylococcal and streptococcal TSS can aid in developing diagnostic criteria.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of staphylococcal and streptococcal TSS in children.
  • To identify potential early clinical diagnostic criteria for differentiating between the two types of TSS.
  • To analyze toxin gene profiles and the utility of Vβ T-cell signatures for diagnosis.

Main Methods:

  • Multicenter retrospective evaluation of clinical data, biological results, and treatment outcomes.
  • Inclusion of children with confirmed or probable staphylococcal or streptococcal TSS admitted to pediatric intensive care units.
  • Analysis of toxin gene profiles of isolated strains and Vβ T-cell signatures.

Main Results:

  • Streptococcal TSS cases exhibited significantly higher organ dysfunction scores and required more frequent respiratory support compared to staphylococcal TSS.
  • Lack of antitoxin therapy was associated with a higher case-fatality rate in pediatric TSS.
  • Specific toxin gene profiles (CC30 for *Staphylococcus aureus*, emm1 for *Streptococcus pyogenes*) suggest clonal etiologies for both TSS types.

Conclusions:

  • Staphylococcal and streptococcal TSS present with distinct clinical signs, infection origins, and prognoses, despite similar toxin mechanisms.
  • Vβ T-cell signature detection proved useful for confirming TSS diagnoses and identifying involved toxins.
  • Findings support the need for tailored diagnostic and therapeutic strategies based on the causative pathogen.

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
260
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...
757
Shock Waves01:16

Shock Waves

While deriving the Doppler formula for the observed frequency of a sound wave, it is assumed that the speed of sound in the medium is greater than the source's speed through it. When this condition is breached, a shock wave occurs.
When the source's speed approaches the speed of sound, constructive interference between successive wavefronts emitted by the source occurs immediately behind it. Initially, scientists believed that this constructive interference would result in such high...
2.6K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.3K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.8K