Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Optimal medical therapy vs. coronary revascularization for patients presenting with chronic total occlusion: A
Mario Iannaccone1, Fabrizio D'ascenzo2, Fabio Piazza1
1SS. Annunziata Hospital, ASL CN 1, Savigliano, Italy.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO-PCI) showed similar major adverse cardiac events compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT). However, CTO-PCI may reduce cardiovascular death, particularly in propensity score-matched studies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Optimal management for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) is debated.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) and optimal medical therapy (OMT) are primary treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of CTO-PCI versus OMT.
- To evaluate outcomes including major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and cardiovascular death.
Main Methods:
- Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched (PSM) observational studies.
- Literature search across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science.
- Primary endpoint: MACE (composite of cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome, repeat PCI).
Main Results:
- Eight studies (4 RCTs, 4 PSMs) with 3,971 patients (2,050 CTO-PCI, 1,921 OMT) and 3-year follow-up included.
- No significant differences in overall MACE, repeat PCI, or acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
- CTO-PCI showed reduced cardiovascular death in PSM studies (OR 0.52, P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
- CTO-PCI is associated with similar MACE rates compared to OMT.
- CTO-PCI may offer a survival benefit regarding cardiovascular death, primarily suggested by PSM data.
Introduction:
The optimal management of patients with coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to compare percutaneous coronary intervention of CTO (CTO-PCI) versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) in CTO patients.
Methods:
A literature search with highly specific terms was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify most relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies with propensity score matching (PSM) evaluating differences in between CTO-PCI versus OMT. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs, composite of cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome, and repeat PCI, re-PCI) while its single components were defined as secondary endpoints.
Results:
A total of eight studies was included, four RCTs and four PSMs. 3,971 patients were included in the analysis (2,050 CTO-PCI versus 1,921 OMT) with a mean follow-up of 3 years. No significant differences were found regarding overall MACE, re-PCI and AMI. Regarding CV-death, CTO-PCI was associated with a better outcome compared with OMT driven by PSMs (OR 0.52, 0.0.81, P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
As compared to OMT, CTO-PCI was associated with similar MACE rate; however, CTO-PCI may be associated with reduced CV death, mainly due to PSMs effect.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Adjusting a Traverse
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...