Interventions to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis in children: A systematic review

Andrés Uribe-Restrepo1,2, Alexandra Cossio2,3, Mayur M Desai4

  • 1Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia.

Insights

Treatments for childhood cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) lack specific data. This review found limited evidence on pediatric CL interventions, highlighting a need for dedicated research and guidelines for effective case management.

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • Current management of childhood cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) relies on adult data.
  • There is a significant gap in understanding effective treatments for CL in children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the efficacy and safety of interventions for treating CL in children (≤12 years old).
  • To identify unmet needs in pediatric CL research and clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of randomized clinical trials and cohort studies was conducted.
  • Searches were performed across multiple databases without language or publication date restrictions.
  • Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers.

Main Results:

  • Eight studies (6 RCTs, 2 non-randomized) were included, with most excluding pediatric-specific outcomes.
  • Efficacy for American CL (ACL) treatments varied: miltefosine (68-83%) and meglumine antimoniate (MA) (17-69%).
  • Old-World CL (OWCL) treatments showed varying efficacy: cryotherapy (42%) vs. intralesional MA (72%). Few studies reported adverse events, with no serious events noted.

Conclusions:

  • Evidence on pediatric CL treatment efficacy is limited.
  • There is a critical need for specific pediatric formulations, adverse event surveillance, and tailored clinical trial guidelines for CL management in children.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.3K
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions01:03

Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions

Nursing interventions are chosen as part of the planning process to achieve patient outcomes. Once nursing diagnoses are determined, the goals and outcomes are specified, then the nursing interventions are selected and individualized according to the patient's situation.
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
3.9K
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
3.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.3K