Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Computer-based Multitaper Spectrogram Program for Electroencephalographic Data
Published on: November 13, 2019
Program implementer perspectives replicating evidence based sexual reproductive health programs
Jenita Parekh1, Robert Blum2, Valerie Caldas3
1The Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States; The Johns Hopkins Center for Child & Community Health, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Suite 4200, Mason F. Lord Building, Center Tower, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States; Child Trends, Inc., 7315 Wisconsin Ave, Suite 1200W, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States.
Purpose:
Explore factors affecting implementation of evidence based adolescent sexual/reproductive health programs, from the perspectives of program implementers.
Methods:
In-depth interviews were conducted with 18 program implementers delivering six sexual/reproductive health programs in New Jersey. Programs were delivered among 2698 primarily African American and Hispanic adolescents in school and community-based settings. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed iteratively for themes by trained experts.
Results:
Program implementers reported weaknesses in the program curricula content and design, scheduling constraints with partner sites, and questions from adolescents as factors challenging to implementation. Relationship-building (with adolescents and community partners) and answering adolescent questions were identified as strategies to program implementation. Implementers expressed need for flexibility in the curriculum to tailor the program to participant needs. However, implementers felt restricted in tailoring the program because of a perceived need to adhere to the prescribed program.
Conclusions:
Evidence based programs may need to provide more flexibility for implementers to customize programs to student needs. Given the age range of the target audience (ages 10-19), programming should consider the variance of an adolescent's life and assumptions regarding adolescent biology knowledge, modes of communication, and type of sexual relationships. Additionally, facilitators may better meet student needs if they feel less restricted.
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
Reproductive Cloning
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
In SCNT, an egg cell is taken from an animal and its nucleus is removed, creating an enucleated egg. Then a somatic...
Replication in Prokaryotes
Chromosome Replication
DNA Replication
Replication in Prokaryotes
DNA replication...
Replication in Eukaryotes

