No better than chance? Developments in predicting adolescent suicide, a commentary on Mars et al. (2018) and Beckman
Rosemary Sedgwick1, Dennis Ougrin1
1Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Abstract:
Suicide is the second leading cause of death in young people aged 10-24 globally (Patton et al., 2009) and it is therefore of vital importance that we understand more about how to identify those at risk. Many of those who proceed to die by suicide will not have interacted with mental health services (Kidger et al., 2012), and therefore predictors of suicide attempts and completed suicides are relevant not only to mental health services but also to schools and communities. Despite years of research, it continues to be challenging to identify those young people who undergo transition from thinking about suicide to attempting suicide as well as those young people who undergo transition from self-harm to completed suicide. This commentary will look at the two accompanying papers by Mars et al. (2018) and Beckman et al. (2018); which seek to increase our understanding of which children and young people may proceed to engage with self-harm and die by suicide.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Adolescence
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...


