Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Identifying PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors with Surface Plasmon Resonance Technology
Published on: May 2, 2025
Predicting tumour response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy with computational modelling
Damijan Valentinuzzi1,2,3, Urban Simončič1,2, Katja Uršič4
1Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Abstract:
Cancer immunotherapy is a rapidly developing field, with numerous drugs and therapy combinations waiting to be tested in pre-clinical and clinical settings. However, the costly and time-consuming trial-and-error approach to development of new treatment paradigms creates a research bottleneck, motivating the development of complementary approaches. Computational modelling is a compelling candidate for this task, however, difficulties associated with the validation of such models limit their use in pre-clinical and clinical settings. Here we propose a bottom-up deterministic computational model to simulate tumour response to treatment with anti-programmed-death-1 antibodies (anti-PD-1). The model was built with validation in mind, and so contains minimum number of parameters, and only four free parameters. Moreover, all model parameters can be measured experimentally. Free parameters were tuned by fitting the model to experimental data from the literature, using B16-F10 murine melanoma implanted into wild type (C57BL/6), as well as into immunodeficient (NSG) mice strains, and treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies. The model's predictive ability was verified on two independent datasets from literature with different but well-known inputs. To identify possible biomarkers of response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, sensitivity study of key model parameters was performed. Good agreement between the simulated tumour growth curves and the experimental data was achieved, with mean relative deviations in the range of 13%-20%. Our sensitivity study demonstrated that major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I expression was the only parameter able to clearly discriminate responders from non-responders to anti-PD-1 therapy. Additionally, the results of sensitivity studies suggest that MHC class I expression might affect the predictive ability of other biomarkers that are currently used in the clinics, such as PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression. Interestingly, our model predicts the best response to anti-PD-1 therapy for subjects with moderate PD-L1 values. Such computational models show promise to support, guide and accelerate future immunotherapy research.
Insights
Computational modeling accelerates cancer immunotherapy research by simulating anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) antibody treatment response. Major histocompatibility complex class I expression is identified as a key biomarker for predicting patient response.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Computational Biology
- Oncology
Background:
- Cancer immunotherapy, particularly with anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies, is advancing rapidly.
- Traditional trial-and-error methods for developing new treatments are time-consuming and expensive, creating a bottleneck in research.
- Computational modeling offers a complementary approach, but validation challenges limit its clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a bottom-up deterministic computational model for simulating tumor response to anti-PD-1 antibody therapy.
- To identify potential biomarkers for predicting response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.
- To assess the influence of model parameters on treatment outcomes and explore biomarker interactions.
Main Methods:
- A bottom-up deterministic computational model was created with minimal, experimentally measurable parameters.
- The model was fitted to experimental data from B16-F10 melanoma in mice treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies.
- Model predictive accuracy was validated using two independent literature datasets; sensitivity analyses were performed.
Main Results:
- The model accurately simulated tumor growth curves, achieving mean relative deviations of 13%-20% compared to experimental data.
- Sensitivity studies revealed that Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class I expression is a critical differentiator between responders and non-responders.
- MHC class I expression may influence the predictive power of current biomarkers like PD-1 ligand (PD-L1), with optimal response predicted at moderate PD-L1 levels.
Conclusions:
- Validated computational models can accelerate and guide cancer immunotherapy research.
- MHC class I expression is a promising biomarker for predicting response to anti-PD-1 therapy.
- Understanding biomarker interactions, such as MHC class I and PD-L1, is crucial for optimizing immunotherapy strategies.
More Related Videos
09:11Y-90 Radioembolization and PD-1 Inhibitor as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: May 24, 2024
10:18Author Spotlight: Magnetic Fluorescent Bead-Based Dual-Reporter Flow Analysis of PDL1-Vaxx Peptide Vaccine-Induced Antibody Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 Interaction
Published on: July 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN2
With increased substitution on the alkyl halide,...
Tumor Immunotherapy
PD Controller: Design
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.