Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

246
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
246
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

8.8K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
8.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combining morphological traits and measurements of the skull for osteological sex estimation using random forest modeling.

Journal of forensic sciences·2025
Same author

Forensic Anthropology as Practiced in the United States: Qualifications, Standards, and Ethical Practice.

American journal of biological anthropology·2025
Same author

Decision trees for combining morphological traits and measurements of the skull for osteological sex estimation.

Journal of forensic sciences·2025
Same author

Female lineages and changing kinship patterns in Neolithic Çatalhöyük.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

The Construction of Community at Early Bronze Age Karataş-Semayük, Southwestern Anatolia.

American journal of biological anthropology·2025
Same author

Decision trees for estimating osteological sex from the skull using an expanded suite of morphological traits.

Journal of forensic sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Isolation of Epithelial Cells from Human Dental Follicle
04:07

Isolation of Epithelial Cells from Human Dental Follicle

Published on: November 5, 2021

3.3K

Observer error and its impact on ancestry estimation using dental morphology.

Marin A Pilloud1, Donovan M Adams2, Joseph T Hefner3

  • 1Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA. mpilloud@unr.edu.

International Journal of Legal Medicine
|December 20, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Observer error in dental morphology data collection impacts ancestry estimation in forensic anthropology. Improving rater reliability through training and trait selection is crucial for accurate forensic analysis.

Keywords:
ASUDASBreakpointsDental non-metricsForensic anthropologyInterobserver errorRater reliability

More Related Videos

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

14.4K
Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
05:30

Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials

Published on: January 10, 2025

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Isolation of Epithelial Cells from Human Dental Follicle
04:07

Isolation of Epithelial Cells from Human Dental Follicle

Published on: November 5, 2021

3.3K
Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

14.4K
Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
05:30

Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials

Published on: January 10, 2025

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic anthropology
  • Dental morphology
  • Human variation

Background:

  • Dental morphology is increasingly utilized in forensic anthropology for ancestry estimation.
  • Understanding observer error in data collection and method application is critical as these methods develop.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess observer error in collecting dental morphological data.
  • To evaluate the impact of observer error on ancestry estimation methods.
  • To propose solutions for mitigating observer error in forensic dental analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Ten observers collected data on 19 dental morphological traits from nine dental casts.
  • Interrater reliability was calculated using various statistical measures.
  • Collected data were applied to three distinct ancestry estimation methods.

Main Results:

  • Low interrater reliability was observed for most dental morphological traits across all observers.
  • Rater reliability improved when comparing only experienced observers and dichotomizing traits.
  • Variations in trait scoring led to differing ancestry estimations across the applied methods.

Conclusions:

  • Observer error significantly affects the accuracy of dental morphology-based ancestry estimation.
  • Enhanced training in dental anthropology and the use of traits with high rater agreement can address these issues.
  • Standardization of data collection and method application is necessary for reliable forensic anthropological analyses.