Boys and girls differ in symptoms and neurodevelopmental outcome after perinatal metabolic acidosis, a
Maria Hafström1,2,3, Øyvind Salvesen4, Ingemar Kjellmer1
1Department of Paediatrics, Institute of Clinical Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Insights
Sex differences impact infant health and development. Boys with birth metabolic acidosis, even if seemingly healthy, show worse outcomes than girls, suggesting sex is a key factor in assessing these infants.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Perinatal Health
Background:
- Metabolic acidosis in term infants can affect perinatal health and long-term development.
- Existing research may not fully account for sex-based variations in outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate sex differences in term infants with metabolic acidosis.
- To evaluate the impact of sex on perinatal health, symptomatology, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 6.5 years.
Main Methods:
- Population-based cohort study of 14,687 term infants.
- Prospective identification of 78 infants with metabolic acidosis, with two matched controls per case.
- Analysis of sex differences in perinatal characteristics and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 6.5 years, with subgroup analysis based on neonatal care needs.
Main Results:
- Acidotic boys without need for specialized neonatal care exhibited poorer perinatal symptoms and less favorable neurodevelopmental outcomes compared to girls.
- A male disadvantage in neurodevelopmental outcomes was also observed in infants without acidosis.
- Neurodevelopmental outcome at 6.5 years was significantly associated with Apgar score at 10 minutes, need for neonatal care, and sex, but not with acidosis itself.
Conclusions:
- Sex significantly influences immediate symptomatology and neurodevelopmental outcomes in term infants with metabolic acidosis.
- These sex-based differences are evident even in infants who appear healthy neonatally.
- The findings underscore the importance of considering sex as a factor in the clinical assessment of infants with metabolic acidosis.
Aim:
To evaluate sex differences in infants born at term with metabolic acidosis with regard to perinatal health and symptomatology, and developmental outcome.
Methods:
From a population-based cohort of infants born at term (n = 14 687), 78 were prospectively identified as having metabolic acidosis at birth. Two matched controls per case were selected. Sex differences in perinatal characteristics and in neurodevelopmental outcome at 6.5 years of age were analysed. Subgroup analysis was made based on need of neonatal care and planned follow-up.
Results:
Acidotic boys who appeared healthy, that is with no need of specialised neonatal care respectively only followed at ordinary health care service, have worse perinatal symptoms and less favourable neurodevelopmental outcome compared to girls. The male disadvantage concerning neurodevelopmental outcome was also indicated in children without acidosis. Outcome at 6.5 years was associated with Apgar at 10 minutes (p = 0.03), need of neonatal care (p = 0.04) and sex (p = 0.02) but not acidosis per se (p = 0.54).
Conclusion:
Sex affected immediate symptomatology in term acidotic infants and neurodevelopmental outcome at the age of 6.5 years. The findings were seen in those who appeared healthy in the neonatal period. The results suggest that sex should be considered in assessment of acidotic children.
More Related Videos
06:55An Unpredictable Chronic Mild Stress Protocol for Instigating Depressive Symptoms, Behavioral Changes and Negative Health Outcomes in Rodents
Published on: December 2, 2015
05:13Preclinical Model of Prenatal Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Exposure to Assess Its Impact on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes
Published on: February 28, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Diagnosing Acidosis and Alkalosis
First, the pH level is assessed to determine whether the blood pH is normal (7.35–7.45), low (acidosis), or high (alkalosis).
Next, the PCO2 and...
What is Metabolism?
What is Population Genetics?
What are Populations and Communities?
Conservation of Small Populations
Population Growth
