Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: May 27, 2022
Practical risk management in early phase clinical trials.
Simon Coates1, Jörg Täubel2,3, Ulrike Lorch2
1Richmond Pharmacology, St George's University, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK. s.coates@richmondpharmacology.com.
Template stopping rules for early phase clinical trials offer a standardized, robust approach to risk management. These adverse reaction (AR) rules ensure participant safety and regulatory compliance in complex trial designs.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmacovigilance
- Regulatory Science
Background:
- Stopping rules are crucial for risk management in early phase clinical trials, ensuring participant safety.
- Regulatory requirements, such as the European Medicine Agency's guidelines, mandate robust risk management strategies.
- Increasing trial complexity necessitates standardized approaches to risk management, particularly for adverse reactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present template stopping rules for adverse reactions (ARs) in early phase clinical trials.
- To provide a standardized, adaptable framework that meets regulatory requirements.
- To address the challenges posed by complex trial designs like integrated trials.
Main Methods:
- Developed template AR rules using a systematic, objective, and consistent process.
- Incorporated severity (objective grading), seriousness, frequency, and reversibility of ARs.
- Created a single-page table for ease of use, guiding decisions on participant management, dosing, and dose escalation.
Main Results:
- Successfully applied template AR rules to numerous early phase adaptive integrated trials in the UK.
- Received regulatory authorization for trials utilizing these rules.
- Presented the template rule table and case studies of trial-specific adaptations.
Conclusions:
- A systematic, objective, and consistent approach to risk management in large integrated trials can be simple yet robust.
- Facilitates effective decision-making and trial progression.
- Effectively safeguards participant safety while managing adverse reactions.
More Related Videos
05:16Characterizing Exon Skipping Efficiency in DMD Patient Samples in Clinical Trials of Antisense Oligonucleotides
Published on: May 7, 2020
14:45Enumeration of Major Peripheral Blood Leukocyte Populations for Multicenter Clinical Trials Using a Whole Blood Phenotyping Assay
Published on: September 16, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...