Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Surgical considerations in implant dentistry.

L B Shulman1

  • 1Department of Implant Research, Forsyth Dental Center, Boston, MA 02115.

Journal of Dental Education
|December 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

Standardized clinical trials in implant dentistry are rare, leading to reliance on retrospective data. Prioritizing prospective trials is crucial for evidence-based decisions in implant dentistry.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Retrospective radiographic analysis of sinus graft and implant placement procedures from the Academy of Osseointegration Consensus Conference on Sinus Grafts.

The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry·2001
Same author

Sinus Graft Consensus Conference. Introduction.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·1998
Same author

Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·1998
Same author

Avoiding and coping with surgically related implant problems.

Dental implantology update·1998
Same author

Dental implant infections.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·1997
Same author

Twenty-five years in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Journal of the Massachusetts Dental Society·1989
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Implant Dentistry
  • Clinical Trials
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Standardized prospective clinical trials are infrequent in implant dentistry.
  • Most existing implant studies are retrospective, lacking uniformity in methodology and definitions of success.
  • Limited comparative data exists for partially edentulous patients, necessitating reliance on interpolation and retrospection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the limitations of current implant dentistry research due to the scarcity of prospective trials.
  • To emphasize the importance of patient safety and informed consent in the absence of a robust evidence base.
  • To provide guidance on implant selection and management based on available benefit/risk information.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on clinical trials in implant dentistry.
  • Analysis of the implications of retrospective study designs on clinical decision-making.
  • Evaluation of factors influencing implant efficacy and safety, including patient, implant, and site selection, and surgical/prosthetic management.

Main Results:

  • Retrospective studies lack uniformity, hindering critical clinical decisions, especially for partially edentulous patients.
  • Osseointegrated root forms are recommended for adequate bone availability.
  • Blade and subperiosteal implants are indicated for restricted bone spaces.

Conclusions:

  • Prospective clinical trials are essential and should be the highest priority for future implant research.
  • Standardized methodologies and definitions of success are needed to build a reliable evidence base.
  • Careful patient selection, implant choice, and surgical/prosthetic management are paramount for optimizing outcomes and ensuring safety.

Related Experiment Videos