Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Virtual Prism Adaptation Therapy: Protocol for Validation in Healthy Adults
Published on: February 12, 2020
Theoretical Study of Refraction Effects of Plano Ophthalmic Prisms
David A Atchison, Marwan Suheimat1
1School of Optometry and Vision Sciences and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia *d.atchison@qut.edu.au.
Significance:
Nominally plano prisms can have appreciable refractive errors that exceed the usual prescribing step of 0.25 D, particularly when an eye rotates to view off-axis objects.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to determine theoretically the refractive power effects of nominally plano-refracting power prisms.
Methods:
Plano prisms with zero refraction were designed for the as-worn condition. A basic method was developed to determine refractive effects in the presence of pantoscopic tilt. A refined method was developed that considers the eye rotating behind the lens, and this and the basic method were compared with accurate raytracing.
Results:
Plano prisms of 4 and 8 Δ were designed with astigmatic back surfaces to compensate for oblique incidence, and tangential and sagittal image vergence errors were investigated for base-up (BU) and base-down (BD) directions, 0 and -3.33 D object vergences, and pantoscopic tilts up to 10°. Basic and refined results did not differ from accurate results by more than 0.04 and 0.08 D, respectively. Errors for 8 Δ prisms were approximately twice those for 4 Δ prisms. Errors were approximately proportional to tilt. With 10° tilt, the errors ranged between -0.65 D/-0.23 D (8 Δ BD, -3.33 D object vergence) and +0.36 D/+0.15 D (8 Δ BU, 0 D object vergence). Sagittal errors were generally about one third of corresponding tangential errors. In the presence of tilt, BU prisms had positive errors, and BD prisms had similar, but negative, errors for distance objects. At -3.33 D object vergence with tilt, negative errors for BD were greater than positive errors for BU. When the eye rotates to look at objects at different positions, errors can increase beyond those occurring on-axis.
Conclusions:
When designed for nontilted conditions, but then subjected to tilt or to viewing off-axis objects, plano prisms can have errors exceeding the usual prescribing step of 0.25 D.
Related Concept Videos
Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice
Theories provide a perspective to assess patients' conditions and organize data and methods. They also assist in analyzing and interpreting information. They represent a...
Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder
Biological approach
The biological approach posits that internal, organic factors are the primary causes of such disorders. This perspective emphasizes brain structure and function, genetic predispositions, and neurotransmitter imbalances. For example, schizophrenia has been associated with both genetic...
Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling
Buffer Effectiveness
The buffer capacity is the amount of acid or base that can be added to a given volume...
Framing Effects
Biological Effects of Radiation

