Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score and EuroSCORE-2 Appropriately Assess 30-Day Postoperative Mortality in the

Nadia Bouabdallaoui1, Susanna R Stevens2, Torsten Doenst3

  • 1Departments of Medicine, ontreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal, Canada (N.B., J.L.R.).

Circulation. Heart Failure
|December 21, 2018
PubMed

Insights

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and EuroSCORE-2 (ES2) risk scores effectively assess 30-day mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, though STS scores tend to underestimate risk.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Cardiac Surgery Risk Assessment
  • Medical Device Evaluation

Background:

  • The STICH trial confirmed survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for ischemic cardiomyopathy.
  • Accurate risk assessment is crucial for CABG in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD).
  • Limited data exist on the performance of STS and EuroSCORE-2 (ES2) in LVD patients undergoing CABG.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score and EuroSCORE-2 (ES2) in predicting 30-day postoperative mortality.
  • To compare the predictive performance of STS and ES2 in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% undergoing CABG.
  • To assess risk stratification in both a clinical trial (STICH) and a contemporary cohort (CC) of LVD patients.

Main Methods:

  • Calculated STS and ES2 scores for 814 STICH patients and 1246 contemporary cohort (CC) patients.
  • Analyzed 30-day postoperative mortality rates in both cohorts.
  • Assessed the predictive accuracy using C-statistics for STS and ES2 scores.

Main Results:

  • Significant variation in 30-day postoperative mortality risk was observed.
  • STS scores consistently yielded lower risk estimates than ES2.
  • Both scores demonstrated moderately good predictive accuracy (C-statistics ranging from 0.707 to 0.744).
  • Contemporary cohort patients had higher STS/ES2 scores but lower mortality than STICH patients, suggesting improved outcomes over time.

Conclusions:

  • 30-day postoperative mortality risk in CABG patients with LVD varies considerably.
  • Both STS and ES2 scores are effective tools for risk evaluation in this population.
  • The STS score tends to underestimate the actual postoperative mortality risk.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Contemporary Psychology01:29

Contemporary Psychology

Psychology explores human behavior and mental processes through various lenses, each offering unique insights. This overview examines key subfields, including biopsychology, evolutionary, developmental, personality, and social psychology, highlighting their approaches and contributions to understanding complex human behaviors.
Biopsychology
Biopsychology, also known as biological psychology or behavioral neuroscience, focuses on the biological underpinnings of behavior and mental processes. It...
2.2K
Thoracic Aorta01:15

Thoracic Aorta

The thoracic section of the aorta begins at the T5 vertebra and extends to the T12 level at the diaphragm, initially progressing through the mediastinum to the left of the spinal column. Throughout its course in the thoracic segment, the thoracic aorta emits various offshoots known collectively as visceral and parietal branches. The branches that predominantly supply blood to visceral organs are termed visceral branches and include bronchial, pericardial, esophageal, and mediastinal arteries,...
1.7K
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.2K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.3K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.6K
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
325