Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.2K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.3K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.3K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

19.6K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.6K
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

11.0K
The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
11.0K
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT01:25

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

485
Calcium-Scoring CT ScanA calcium-scoring CT scan, also known as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, detects calcium deposits in the coronary arteries. This test assesses the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), which can lead to cardiovascular events such as angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac arrest.A calcium-scoring CT scan is generally recommended for individuals at intermediate risk of CAD without symptoms. It includes:Men aged 40-75 and women aged 50-75: Especially those with a...
485
Measures of Central Tendency02:16

Measures of Central Tendency

21.1K
The "center" of a data set is also a way of describing location. The two most widely used measures of the "center" of the data are the mean (average) and the median. The words "mean" and "average" are often used interchangeably. The substitution of one word for the other is common practice. The technical term is "arithmetic mean" and "average" is technically a center location. However, in practice among non-statisticians,...
21.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Creation of a Merged Harmonized Large Database of Subject-Level Data from Acute Secondary Prevention Studies in Minor Non-Cardioembolic Stroke or TIA.

International journal of cerebrovascular disease and stroke·2026
Same author

Theoretical Cost-Effectiveness of PCSK9 Inhibitors in Stroke Due to Intracranial Atherosclerosis.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Strategies for promoting exercise adherence within a cancer exercise recovery program: a qualitative case study.

BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Cost Effectiveness of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Strokes: A US Healthcare Payer Markov Model Informed by Randomized Trials.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same author

Mechanical circulatory assist devices stroke subtype classification: a novel stroke classification system in patients with ventricular assist devices.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2026
Same author

Constraints on a Dark Matter Subhalo Near the Sun from Pulsar Timing.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Management of Patients at Risk of Ischemic Stroke With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in the Absence of Intracardiac Thrombus: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Stroke·2026
Same journal

Update on Rehabilitation After Stroke: Global Changes and the Continued Importance of Therapy Intensity, Dose, and Timing.

Stroke·2026
Same journal

ENTF Neuromodulation Yields Reduced Disability After Stroke: An Individual Participant-Level Data Meta-Analysis.

Stroke·2026
Same journal

Menopause and Its Implications for Stroke in Women.

Stroke·2026
Same journal

Physician Approaches to Determining Goals of Stroke Care for Patients Living With Disability or Dementia: Results from the SEED Mixed-Methods Study.

Stroke·2026
Same journal

Aspirin for Stroke Primary Prevention: A Step Toward Genetic-Driven Personalized Medicine.

Stroke·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application.
09:38

The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application.

Published on: June 12, 2009

26.7K

The 2CAN Score.

Philip Chang1, Ilana Ruff1, Scott J Mendelson1

  • 1From the Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Stroke
|December 21, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new scoring system, 2CAN, effectively identifies acute stroke in hospitalized patients. This tool helps non-neurologists differentiate stroke from mimics, improving timely diagnosis and care.

Keywords:
atrial fibrillationcerebrovascular disorderspatient care managementquality improvementrisk factors

More Related Videos

A Simple Composite Phenotype Scoring System for Evaluating Mouse Models of Cerebellar Ataxia
07:33

A Simple Composite Phenotype Scoring System for Evaluating Mouse Models of Cerebellar Ataxia

Published on: May 21, 2010

37.3K
Z-Scores for Assessing Ovarian Reserve in Young Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation
05:42

Z-Scores for Assessing Ovarian Reserve in Young Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application.
09:38

The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application.

Published on: June 12, 2009

26.7K
A Simple Composite Phenotype Scoring System for Evaluating Mouse Models of Cerebellar Ataxia
07:33

A Simple Composite Phenotype Scoring System for Evaluating Mouse Models of Cerebellar Ataxia

Published on: May 21, 2010

37.3K
Z-Scores for Assessing Ovarian Reserve in Young Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation
05:42

Z-Scores for Assessing Ovarian Reserve in Young Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Internal Medicine
  • Clinical Diagnostics

Background:

  • A significant portion of acute strokes occur in hospitalized patients, often complicating their primary treatment.
  • Distinguishing between stroke and various mimics (e.g., seizures, delirium) is challenging for non-neurologists.
  • A reliable clinical instrument is needed to aid in the early recognition of inpatient strokes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive and validate a clinical scoring system for distinguishing acute stroke from its mimics in hospitalized patients.
  • To improve diagnostic accuracy for suspected strokes presenting within a hospital setting.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of inpatient stroke alerts at a single academic center (January 2014 - December 2016).
  • Data collection included demographics, risk factors, neurological exam findings, vital signs, and laboratory values.
  • Multivariate logistic regression was used to derive a weighted scoring system (2CAN score), validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Main Results:

  • Out of 330 subjects, 35.2% had confirmed stroke, 13.0% had neurological mimics, and 51.8% had non-neurological mimics.
  • Four factors independently predicted stroke: clinical deficit score, recent cardiac procedure, atrial fibrillation history, and new patient status (<24h admission).
  • The 2CAN score demonstrated excellent discrimination (AUC 0.93 in derivation, 0.88 in validation cohorts); a score ≥2 showed 92.2% sensitivity and 69.6% specificity for stroke.

Conclusions:

  • The 2CAN score is a validated tool for recognizing inpatient stroke with high accuracy in a single-center study.
  • The score aids non-neurologists in differentiating stroke from mimics, potentially leading to faster diagnosis and treatment.
  • Further validation in a prospective, multicenter study is recommended to confirm the generalizability of the 2CAN score.