Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients
Published on: April 13, 2021
Assessing and Improving Documentation of Pediatric Brain Death Determination within an Electronic Health Record
Conrad Krawiec1, Gary D Ceneviva1, Neal J Thomas1,2
1Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States.
Insights
Pediatric brain death determination documentation shows variability among providers, impacting diagnosis credibility. Standardizing electronic documentation is recommended to improve consistency and accuracy in these critical cases.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care medicine
- Neurology
- Medical documentation
Background:
- Pediatric brain death determination (BDD) documentation is prone to interprovider variability, potentially affecting diagnosis credibility.
- Variability in documentation can arise from omissions and errors in the electronic health record (EHR).
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe an institutional approach to assessing pediatric BDD documentation.
- To evaluate documentation variation in the EHR for pediatric BDD.
Main Methods:
- A single-institution, cross-sectional review of pediatric patients (<18 years) meeting brain death criteria.
- Assessment of electronic documentation for adherence to institutional BDD policy, including temperature, blood pressure, and absence of interfering medications.
Main Results:
- 33 pediatric brain death cases were reviewed.
- Documentation consistency varied: first exam temperature >36°C (81.8%), blood pressure within range (87.9%), >24h post-admission (84.8%); second exam temperature >36°C (97%), >12h post-first exam (89.7%); sedative infusions discontinued (84.8%).
- Clinical neurologic examinations were fully documented.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric BDD documentation exhibits omissions and errors, with significant interprovider variability.
- Standardizing electronic brain death documents may improve pediatric BDD documentation consistency.
Background/Objective:
Pediatric brain death determination (BDD) can be subject to interprovider variability of documentation, resulting in diagnosis credibility. The aim of this study was to describe our approach to assessing pediatric BDD documentation and documentation variation in the electronic health record (EHR).
Methods:
This was a single institution cross-sectional review of pediatric patients younger than 18 years determined to meet brain death criteria. We assessed electronic documentation and evaluated for the presence of contributing factors that can interfere with the brain death documentation based on our institutional brain death evaluation policy (core body temperature, systolic blood pressure within an acceptable range, sedative/analgesic drug effects, and neuromuscular blockade).
Results:
In total, 33 pediatric brain death patients were identified. This review revealed pediatric BDD documentation consistency (n, %) as follows: performance of the first pediatric brain death clinical examination with temperature above 36°C (27, 81.8%), systolic blood pressure above the defined range (29, 87.9%), more than 24 hours following admission (28, 84.8%); performance of the second pediatric brain death clinical examination with temperature above 36°C (32, 97%), more than 12 hours following the first examination (26, 89.7%); and ensuring sedative infusions were discontinued within the recommended cutoff period prior to pediatric BDD (28, 84.8%). Clinical neurologic examinations were fully documented.
Conclusions:
Pediatric BDD is a rare process subject to documentation omissions and error. Our findings highlight the variability of pediatric BDD electronic documentation among different providers and specialties at our institution. An approach to improving pediatric BDD documentation may start with completing a standardized electronic brain death document.
Related Concept Videos
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Purpose of Health Records II
Data Reporting and Recording
Methods of Documentation I: Source-Oriented Records
In an SOR, each discipline involved in patient care maintains a separate medical record section. This record-keeping method enables easy tracking of patient progress and ensures healthcare staff have access to up-to-date information.
Key Attributes include the following:
The Fossil Record
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:

