Criteria for Clinically Relevant Bleeding in Critically Ill Children: An International Survey

Oliver Karam1, Marianne E Nellis2, Nicole D Zantek3

  • 1Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Richmond, VA.

Insights

Clinically relevant bleeding in critically ill children is poorly defined. This survey identified factors like location and severity that pediatric intensivists consider significant for defining bleeding relevance.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
  • Hemorrhagic Complications
  • Clinical Significance Assessment

Background:

  • Bleeding is a common and serious complication in critically ill children, yet a clear definition of clinically relevant bleeding is lacking for this population.
  • Existing bleeding criteria are primarily for adults, highlighting a critical gap in pediatric critical care research and practice.
  • Understanding pediatric intensivists' perceptions is crucial for developing standardized definitions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify factors influencing pediatric intensivists' perception of clinically relevant bleeding in critically ill children.
  • To lay the groundwork for a validated diagnostic definition of clinically relevant bleeding in pediatric intensive care settings.

Main Methods:

  • An international, web-based survey administered to pediatric critical care physicians and nurse practitioners.
  • Utilized 9-point Likert scales to assess the clinical significance of 103 distinct bleeding characteristics.
  • Collected data from 225 respondents across 16 countries.

Main Results:

  • Bleeding in critical locations (CNS, lungs, etc.), requiring interventions, causing organ failure, or prolonged duration were deemed most clinically relevant.
  • Quantifiable bleeding exceeding 5 mL/kg/hr for over an hour was frequently considered significant.
  • Minor bleeding indicators like blood-tinged urine or streaks in tubes were generally considered irrelevant.

Conclusions:

  • This international survey offers valuable insights into how pediatric intensivists assess bleeding relevance.
  • The findings provide a foundation for developing a standardized, validated definition of clinically relevant bleeding in critically ill children.
  • Establishing clear criteria will improve the diagnosis and management of bleeding complications in pediatric intensive care units.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.8K
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment01:29

Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment

Product specifications define the acceptable quality of a pharmaceutical product by ensuring identity, purity, potency, and strength. These specifications serve as benchmarks during development, manufacturing, and post-approval quality control. Clinically relevant specifications are particularly important because they directly relate to a drug's safety and efficacy in clinical use.Dissolution studies are critical biopharmaceutic tools that link in vitro behavior to in vivo performance. They...
217
Introduction to Surveying, Plane Surveying and Geodetic Surveys01:27

Introduction to Surveying, Plane Surveying and Geodetic Surveys

Surveying is the art and science of mapping the earth's surface. It involves measuring distances, angles in horizontal or vertical directions, and levels to understand the shape and size of land features. Surveying techniques are essential for various tasks, such as identifying the levels of a land area with reference to a specific point, and mapping undulations and water bodies.There are two main types of surveying: plane surveys and geodetic surveys. Plane surveys assume the earth is flat,...
1.0K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.2K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.1K
Bleeding in Fresh Concrete01:22

Bleeding in Fresh Concrete

Bleeding in fresh concrete occurs when water from the mix rises to the surface. This happens because the mix's solid components fail to retain all the water as they settle, leading to separation where water collects at the top. The severity of bleeding can be measured by assessing the total settlement or by noting the decrease in height per unit height of concrete.
Bleeding can cause several issues in the concrete structure. Sometimes, the rising water gets trapped beneath large aggregate...
576