Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Breath Collection from Children for Disease Biomarker Discovery
Published on: February 14, 2019
Multiple Breath Washout for Diagnosing Asthma and Persistent Wheeze in Young Children
Lambang Arianto1, Henrik Hallas1, Jakob Stokholm1
1Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Insights
Multiple breath washout (MBW) and traditional lung function tests like spirometry are not sensitive enough to diagnose mild asthma in young children. These methods showed limited ability to differentiate between children with and without asthma or persistent wheeze.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Respiratory Medicine
- Diagnostic Tools in Childhood Asthma
Background:
- Early diagnosis of asthma and wheezy disorders in young children is challenging due to the lack of sensitive lung function tests.
- Multiple Breath Washout (MBW) has been proposed as a potentially valuable tool for assessing lung function in this age group.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the discriminative ability of MBW lung clearance index against traditional lung function measurements (spirometry, plethysmography) in preschool children.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of these tests in distinguishing between children with well-controlled asthma/persistent wheeze and healthy controls.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 646 preschool children from the Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood (COPSAC2010) underwent MBW, spirometry, and plethysmography before age 6.
- Asthma/persistent wheeze was prospectively diagnosed using a validated symptom-based algorithm.
- Statistical analyses included Student's t-tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to assess discriminative power.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was found in MBW lung clearance index between children with and without asthma/persistent wheeze (AUC=0.48).
- Plethysmography (specific airway resistance, AUC=0.56) and spirometry (FEV1% predicted, AUC=0.56; FEF25-75%, AUC=0.58) showed statistically significant but modest differences.
- FEV1 (in L/s) and FEV1/FVC ratio did not show significant differences between the groups.
Conclusions:
- MBW, spirometry, and plethysmography, as applied in this study, are not sufficiently sensitive for diagnosing mild asthma in young children.
- Further research is needed to identify more effective lung function assessment tools for early detection of pediatric respiratory conditions.
Abstract:
Rationale: There is an unmet need for sensitive lung function tests for young children to aid in the diagnosis of asthma and wheezy disorders. We hypothesized that multiple breath washout (MBW) could be a valuable tool for such a purpose. Objectives: To compare the ability of MBW lung clearance index with traditional lung function measurements to discriminate between preschool children with well-controlled asthma/persistent wheeze and healthy children. Methods: We investigated 646 children from the COPSAC2010 (Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood 2010) mother-child cohort, who completed MBW testing with nitrogen, spirometry, and plethysmography before age 6 years. Asthma/persistent wheeze was prospectively diagnosed according to a validated symptom-based algorithm at the COPSAC clinic. Student's t tests and receiver operating characteristic curves were applied to analyze the discriminative ability of the lung function indices. Results: A total of 144 (22.3%) children were diagnosed with asthma/persistent wheeze during their first 6 years of life. Lung clearance index from MBW was not significantly different in children with versus those without asthma/persistent wheeze (mean standard deviation [SD] = 6.96 [1.14] vs. 6.95 [0.93], mean difference [95% confidence interval] = 0.02 [-0.18 to 0.22], P = 0.86, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.48), whereas significant differences were observed for specific airway resistance from plethysmography (1.21 kPa/s [0.31] vs. 1.14 kPa/s [0.25]; +0.07 kPa/s [0.02-0.13]; P < 0.01; AUC = 0.56) and spirometry forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) % predicted (99.4% [12.0] vs. 102.6% [12.5]; -3.2% [-5.6 to -0.9]; P < 0.01; AUC = 0.56) and forced expiratory flow at 25-75% (1.55 L/s [0.44] vs. 1.68 L/s [0.46]; -0.14 L/s [-0.22 to -0.05]; P < 0.01; AUC = 0.58). FEV1 (L/s) and FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio were not significantly different (P > 0.4). Conclusions: MBW, spirometry, and plethysmography are not sensitive tools for diagnosing mild asthmatic disease in young children.
Related Concept Videos
Breathing
Asthma-I: Introduction
Diagnosing Acidosis and Alkalosis
First, the pH level is assessed to determine whether the blood pH is normal (7.35–7.45), low (acidosis), or high (alkalosis).
Next, the PCO2 and...
Asthma-III: Symptoms and Complications
Classification of Asthma
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Asthma: Pathogenesis and Management
Asthma is classified as allergic and non-allergic. Allergens such as dust mites, pollen, and pet dander trigger allergic asthma, while factors like cold air, intense emotions, or exercise can induce non-allergic asthma.

