Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

07:38
Cardiac Catheterization in Mice to Measure the Pressure Volume Relationship: Investigating the Bowditch Effect
Published on: June 14, 2015
18.7K
Relationship between response to lusutrombopag and splenic volume
Haruki Uojima1, Yoshitaka Arase2, Norio Itokawa3
1Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura 247-8533, Japan.
World Journal of Gastroenterology
|December 25, 2018
Summary
Splenic volume impacts lusutrombopag efficacy in chronic liver disease patients. Lower splenic volume correlated with increased platelet counts, suggesting it
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Hematology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Chronic liver disease (CLD) frequently leads to thrombocytopenia, increasing bleeding risk.
- Lusutrombopag is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist used to increase platelet counts.
- Predictors of lusutrombopag response in CLD patients require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the correlation between lusutrombopag efficacy and patient clinical characteristics.
- To identify factors influencing treatment response in thrombocytopenic CLD patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, multicenter study of 50 thrombocytopenic CLD patients in Japan.
- Patients received oral lusutrombopag (3.0 mg/day for 7 days).
- Treatment response defined by specific platelet count increases post-administration.
Main Results:
- 80% of patients responded to lusutrombopag.
- Responders had significantly lower splenic volume and body weight compared to non-responders.
- Higher white blood cell count and hemoglobin levels were observed in responders.
- Multivariate analysis identified splenic volume as an independent predictor of response (OR=11.2, P=0.025).
- Splenic volume negatively correlated with changes in platelet count (r=-0.524, P=0.001).
Conclusions:
- Splenic volume is a key factor influencing platelet count changes after lusutrombopag administration in CLD patients.
- This finding may aid in predicting treatment outcomes and optimizing therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview
5.1K
Agonists can bind with and activate receptors, resulting in the formation of drug-receptor complexes. Once formed, these complexes catalyze many biochemical processes at the cellular level and subsequently induce a pharmacologic response. The degree of response is directly proportional to the fraction of activated receptors, which in turn, depends on the concentration of the drug at the receptor site as well as the sensitivity of the receptor. An increase in the administered dose contributes to...
5.1K
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy
6.5K
The potency of a drug is the measure of its ability to produce a biological response and can be compared by looking at the half-maximum effective concentration or EC50 values of different drugs. A lower EC50 value indicates higher potency of the drug. In the dose–response curve of two antihypertensive drugs, candesartan and irbesartan, a significant difference is observed in their EC50 values. A lower EC50 value for candesartan indicates that it is more potent than irbesartan, as it...
6.5K
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity
9.7K
Drugs exert their therapeutic effects by interacting with receptors, enzymes, or ion channels that are present throughout the human body. The strength and duration of the interaction between a drug and its target receptor are characterized by the selectivity and specificity of the drug. Selectivity refers to a drug's strong preference for its intended target over other targets. For instance, isoprenaline, a non-selective β-adrenergic agonist, interacts with both β1- and...
9.7K
Relationship Formation
46.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.2K
Ending Relationships
189
The dissolution of intimate relationships presents complex emotional and psychological challenges, particularly when emotional bonds are strong, the relationship is long-standing, and perceived alternatives are limited. This distress often intensifies in romantic breakups, where the initiator may experience greater turmoil than the rejected partner. Contributing factors include residual attachment, guilt over causing pain, and uncertainty about how to manage the situation. The stress is further...
189
Relationship Growth
218
Interpersonal relationships progress through stages, beginning with awareness and moving toward mutuality, where emotional connections deepen. While many relationships remain at moderate levels of mutuality, deeper connections form through self-disclosure, trust, and interdependence.Self-DisclosureSelf-disclosure involves revealing personal information, starting with surface-level details and gradually progressing to more intimate content. As trust grows, individuals feel more comfortable...
218

