Tests for paired count outcomes
James A Proudfoot1, Tuo Lin1, Bokai Wang2
1Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Abstract:
For moderate to large sample sizes, all tests yielded pvalues close to the nominal, except when models were misspecified. The signed-rank test generally had the lowest power. Within the current context of count outcomes, the signed-rank test shows subpar power when compared with tests that are contrasted based on full data, such as the GEE. Parametric models for count outcomes such as the GLMM with a Poisson for marginal count outcomes are quite sensitive to departures from assumed parametric models. There is some small bias for all the asymptotic tests, that is, the signed-ranktest, GLMM and GEE, especially for small sample sizes. Resampling methods such as permutation can help alleviate this.
Related Concept Videos
DNA Base Pairing
DNA Base Pairing
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...


