Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

33.2K
Erwin Chargaff’s rules on DNA equivalence paved the way for the discovery of base pairing in DNA. Chargaff’s rules state that in a double-stranded DNA molecule,
33.2K
DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

32.4K
32.4K
Predicting Reaction Outcomes02:24

Predicting Reaction Outcomes

10.8K
Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
10.8K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

411
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
411
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs04:01

VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs

53.1K
Effect of Lone Pairs of Electrons on Molecule Geometry
53.1K
Outcomes of Glycolysis01:13

Outcomes of Glycolysis

107.2K
Nearly all the energy used by cells comes from the bonds that make up complex organic compounds. These organic compounds are broken down into simpler molecules, such as glucose. As a result, cells extract energy from glucose over many chemical reactions—a process called cellular respiration.
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
107.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Use of liposomal irinotecan with 5-FU and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) in neoadjuvant pancreatic adenocarcinoma: NEO-Nal-IRI trial.

The oncologist·2026
Same author

Neoadjuvant Sacituzumab Govitecan in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Primary Results of the SURE-01 Trial.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same author

Changing internal medicine residents' attitudes towards managing people with obesity using an interactive educational session with lecture and embedded real-life patients' experiences.

Obesity research & clinical practice·2026
Same author

Robust neurogenesis in chronic stroke monkeys following mesenchymal stem cell transplantation plus intermittent theta-burst stimulation.

Signal transduction and targeted therapy·2026
Same author

An operational target trial emulation framework for causal inference using electronic health record data.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

Serum metabolomic profiles associated with psychoneurological symptoms in women with early-stage breast cancer over one year.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same journal

Associations between wearable-device-measured daytime and nighttime light exposures and dementia risk: A prospective cohort study.

General psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Resting-state connectivity and tobacco smoking in clinical high-risk for psychosis (NAPLS-3)".

General psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Resilient interpersonal pathways from loneliness to suicidal ideation among Chinese transgender women during global health crises.

General psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Exercise type, dose and mental health outcomes in youth: Which types and doses are sufficient?

General psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Depression meets obesity: Co-occurrence patterns, temporal trends and socioeconomic correlates across 199 countries and territories.

General psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates the hemispheric imbalance in major depressive disorder.

General psychiatry·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits Oryctolagus Cuniculus Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions
10:00

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits Oryctolagus Cuniculus Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions

Published on: March 16, 2018

14.9K

Tests for paired count outcomes.

James A Proudfoot1, Tuo Lin1, Bokai Wang2

  • 1Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.

General Psychiatry
|December 25, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

For count outcome data, the signed-rank test has low power compared to generalized estimating equations (GEE). Parametric models like generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) are sensitive to misspecification, but resampling methods can help reduce bias.

Keywords:
analytical, diagnostic and therapeuticbiostatisticsepidemiologic methodsinvestigative techniquesstatistics as topic

More Related Videos

Mouse Model of Surgical Uterine Injury and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
04:08

Mouse Model of Surgical Uterine Injury and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes

Published on: June 27, 2025

1.1K
Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits Oryctolagus Cuniculus Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions
10:00

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits Oryctolagus Cuniculus Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions

Published on: March 16, 2018

14.9K
Mouse Model of Surgical Uterine Injury and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
04:08

Mouse Model of Surgical Uterine Injury and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes

Published on: June 27, 2025

1.1K
Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.5K

Area of Science:

  • Statistical modeling
  • Biostatistics
  • Data analysis

Background:

  • Statistical tests are crucial for analyzing count outcome data.
  • Model misspecification can impact the validity of statistical tests.
  • Understanding the power and bias of different statistical methods is essential for accurate data interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the statistical power and bias of various tests for count outcomes.
  • To evaluate the performance of the signed-rank test against other methods like GEE and GLMM.
  • To assess the impact of model misspecification on p-values and test performance.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations were conducted to evaluate test performance under different conditions.
  • Comparison of p-value distributions for moderate to large sample sizes.
  • Assessment of statistical power for the signed-rank test versus GEE and GLMM.
  • Evaluation of bias in asymptotic tests, including signed-rank, GLMM, and GEE.
  • Exploration of resampling methods, such as permutation tests, to mitigate bias.

Main Results:

  • For moderate to large sample sizes, most tests yielded nominal p-values unless models were misspecified.
  • The signed-rank test consistently demonstrated the lowest statistical power among the compared methods for count outcomes.
  • Parametric models like GLMM with Poisson distribution are sensitive to deviations from assumed model structures.
  • All asymptotic tests (signed-rank, GLMM, GEE) exhibited small biases, particularly with smaller sample sizes.
  • Resampling techniques, specifically permutation tests, showed potential in reducing observed biases.

Conclusions:

  • The signed-rank test is not recommended for count outcome analysis due to its subpar power compared to GEE.
  • Careful model specification is critical when using parametric models like GLMM for count data.
  • Resampling methods offer a valuable approach to enhance the reliability of statistical tests by reducing bias, especially in smaller sample sizes.