Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Bronchial Thermoplasty: A Novel Therapeutic Approach to Severe Asthma
Published on: November 4, 2010
Matched cohort study of therapeutic strategies to prevent preschool wheezing/asthma attacks
Jonathan Grigg1, Anjan Nibber2, James Y Paton3
1Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK, j.grigg@qmul.ac.uk.
Insights
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) did not reduce wheezing/asthma attacks in preschoolers compared to short-acting β-agonists (SABA) alone. This study found no added benefit for these common asthma medications in this age group.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Pharmacological Interventions
- Respiratory Health
Background:
- Recurrent wheezing in preschoolers is common, often managed with short-acting β-agonists (SABA).
- Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) are sometimes used to prevent asthma attacks in this population.
- The comparative effectiveness of ICS and LTRA versus SABA alone for preventing wheezing/asthma attacks in young children is not well-established in real-world settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the real-world effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) in preventing wheezing/asthma attacks in preschoolers.
- To compare the outcomes of adding ICS or LTRA to short-acting β-agonist (SABA) therapy versus SABA monotherapy.
Main Methods:
- A historical matched cohort study utilizing UK electronic medical records.
- Included preschool children (1-5 years) with at least two wheezing episodes in a baseline year.
- Children initiating ICS or LTRA were matched 1:4 to those prescribed only SABA, controlling for baseline characteristics. Asthma attacks were defined as emergency attendance, hospital admission, or acute oral corticosteroid prescription.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the odds of wheezing/asthma attacks was observed between the ICS and SABA groups (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85-1.19).
- Similarly, no significant difference was found between the LTRA and SABA groups (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.96-1.72).
- The study included 990 children in the ICS vs. SABA comparison and 259 in the LTRA vs. SABA comparison.
Conclusions:
- Initiating inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) therapy did not demonstrate a reduction in wheezing/asthma attacks compared to short-acting β-agonist (SABA) alone in preschool children with recurrent wheeze.
- These findings suggest that for a broad group of preschoolers with recurrent wheeze, adding ICS or LTRA to SABA may not provide additional benefit in preventing acute exacerbations in a real-world clinical setting.
- Further research may be needed to identify specific subgroups of preschool children who might benefit from ICS or LTRA therapy.
Background:
An inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) may prevent wheezing/asthma attacks in preschoolers with recurrent wheeze when added to short-acting β-agonist (SABA).
Objective:
The aim of this historical matched cohort study was to assess the effectiveness of these treatments for preventing wheezing/asthma attacks.
Methods:
Electronic medical records from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database were used to characterize a UK preschool population (1-5 years old) with two or more episodes of wheezing during 1 baseline year before first prescription (index date) of ICS or LTRA, or repeat prescription of SABA. Children initiating ICS or LTRA on the index date were matched 1:4 to those prescribed only SABA for age, sex, year of index prescription, mean baseline SABA dose, baseline attacks, baseline antibiotic prescriptions, and eczema diagnosis. Wheezing/asthma attacks (defined as asthma-related emergency attendance, hospital admission, or acute oral corticosteroid prescription) during 1 outcome year were compared using conditional logistic regression.
Results:
Matched ICS and SABA cohorts included 990 and 3,960 children, respectively (61% male; mean [SD] age 3.2 [1.3] years), and matched LTRA and SABA cohorts included 259 and 1,036 children, respectively (65% male; mean [SD] age 2.6 [1.2] years). We observed no significant difference between matched cohorts in the odds of a wheezing/asthma attack: ICS vs SABA, OR (95% CI) 1.01 (0.85-1.19) and LTRA vs SABA, OR (95% CI) 1.28 (0.96-1.72).
Conclusion:
We found no evidence that initiation of ICS or LTRA therapy is associated with fewer attacks during 1 outcome year than SABA alone for a heterogeneous group of preschool children with recurrent wheeze in the real-life clinical setting.
Related Concept Videos
Acid Attack on Concrete
The rate at which hydrogen...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
Sulfate Attack on Concrete
Sulfates from sources like soil, groundwater, or industrial effluents...
Asthma-I: Introduction
Asthma-III: Symptoms and Complications
Classification of Asthma
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:

