Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Correcting standardized expiratory flows for prematurity in ex-preterm survivors-Is it necessary?
Lex W Doyle1,2,3,4, Jeanie L Y Cheong1,2,4, Sarath Ranganathan3,5,6
1Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Insights
Correcting expiratory flow rates for prematurity is not necessary in clinical practice or research. This study found minimal impact on standardized values across childhood and adulthood.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonary physiology
- Pediatric respiratory health
Background:
- Standardized lung function tests are crucial for assessing respiratory health.
- Prematurity can influence lung development and may affect airflow measurements.
- The necessity of correcting for prematurity in lung function studies across different age groups remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of correcting for prematurity on standardized expiratory flow rates.
- To analyze these effects in individuals aged 5 to 70 years.
- To determine if age correction for prematurity is required in clinical and research settings.
Main Methods:
- A theoretical model was used to simulate z-score variations in expiratory flows, adjusting for prematurity and age.
- The model analyzed age ranges from 5 to 16.9 years and 16 to 70 years for both sexes.
- A clinical comparison involved extremely preterm survivors and term-born controls at 8 and 18 years of age.
Main Results:
- Theoretical models showed z-scores generally declining through adolescence and rising in later life.
- The maximum difference in z-scores due to prematurity correction was approximately -0.09 SD for forced vital capacity in early teens.
- Clinical data indicated a maximum gap of 0.06 SD in forced vital capacity at age 8 when prematurity was not corrected.
Conclusions:
- Correction for prematurity does not significantly alter standardized expiratory flow rates.
- Age correction for prematurity is deemed unnecessary for both clinical practice and research in respiratory airflow studies.
- Findings support using uncorrected age in longitudinal and cross-sectional studies of lung function.
Objective:
To determine the effect of correcting for prematurity on standardized values for expiratory flow rates for participants from 5 years through to 70 years of age.
Methods:
In a theoretical model we assumed starting values for expiratory flows that were expected to give ranges within ±2 SD. Keeping expiratory flows, ethnicity and height constant, we then determined how z scores varied between 5 and 16.9 years, and, with two different fixed values for height and expiratory flows, between 16 and 70 years of ages, for both sexes. In a clinical example, we compared expiratory flows with age both corrected and uncorrected for prematurity between 144 survivors born extremely preterm and 141 term-born controls at both 8 and 18 years of age.
Results:
In the theoretical models, z scores mostly declined through childhood until the late teenage years, and then began to rise through later life. The maximum difference in z-scores between corrected and uncorrected scores for a participant born 4 months' preterm would occur in the early teenage years, and for the forced vital capacity would be approximately -0.09 SD wider. In the clinical example not correcting for prematurity resulted in a maximum gap between preterm and term cohorts 0.06 SD wider for the forced vital capacity at 8 years than if age was corrected for prematurity.
Conclusions:
Correction for prematurity is not necessary in clinical practice, and is probably not required for research in studies of respiratory airflow through childhood or adulthood.
Related Concept Videos
Distance Corrections
Power Factor Correction
Standard Electrode Potentials
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction
Standard Enthalpy of Formation
Measurement: Standard Units

