IRF5 Is Required for Bacterial Clearance in Human M1-Polarized Macrophages, and IRF5 Immune-Mediated Disease Risk

Matija Hedl1, Jie Yan1, Heiko Witt2

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520; and.

Insights

Interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) is crucial for macrophage bacterial clearance. Genetic variants in IRF5 influence immune-mediated diseases and impact antimicrobial defenses, affecting disease risk.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Genetics
  • Microbiology

Background:

  • Common Interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) variants are linked to immune-mediated diseases.
  • IRF5 influences pattern recognition receptor (PRR)-induced cytokine production in macrophages.
  • The role of IRF5 in macrophage-mediated bacterial clearance is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of IRF5 in macrophage bacterial clearance.
  • To determine if low IRF5 expression, associated with protection from immune-mediated diseases, impairs bacterial clearance.
  • To elucidate the mechanisms by which IRF5 regulates bacterial clearance.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized M1-differentiated human macrophages.
  • Assessed bacterial clearance in IRF5-deficient and wild-type macrophages.
  • Analyzed the induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2), and autophagy.
  • Investigated the role of IRF5-dependent signaling pathways (MAPK, NF-κB, Akt2).
  • Compared bacterial clearance and pathway induction in macrophages with different IRF5 genetic variants (rs2004640/rs2280714 TT/TT vs. GG/CC).

Main Results:

  • IRF5 is essential for optimal bacterial clearance in PRR-stimulated M1 macrophages.
  • IRF5 induces ROS (via p40phox, p47phox, p67phox), NOS2, and autophagy (via ATG5).
  • IRF5-deficient macrophages exhibit reduced bacterial clearance, which can be restored by complementing these pathways.
  • IRF5-dependent MAPK, NF-κB, and Akt2 pathways are required for antimicrobial functions.
  • Macrophages with low IRF5 expression (GG/CC variant carriers) show diminished ROS, NOS2, and autophagy induction, leading to reduced bacterial clearance compared to high IRF5 expressers (TT/TT variant carriers).

Conclusions:

  • IRF5 plays a critical role in macrophage-mediated bacterial clearance through ROS, NOS2, and autophagy induction.
  • Common IRF5 genetic variants modulate bacterial clearance capacity.
  • Individuals carrying immune-mediated disease-associated IRF5 variants with lower expression may have impaired bacterial clearance, potentially influencing susceptibility to microbial-associated diseases.

Related Concept Videos

Requirements for Human Life01:26

Requirements for Human Life

The Earth and its atmosphere have provided humans with air, water, and food, but these are not the only requirements for survival. Humans also require a specific range of temperature and pressure that the Earth and its atmosphere provides.
Oxygen
Atmospheric air is only about 20 percent oxygen, but that oxygen is a key component of the chemical reactions that keep the body alive, including the reactions that produce ATP. Brain cells are susceptible to a lack of oxygen because they require a...
13.5K
What is the Immune System?01:38

What is the Immune System?

Overview
127.9K
Cell-mediated Immune Responses01:40

Cell-mediated Immune Responses

Overview
84.0K
Histone Variants at the Centromere02:30

Histone Variants at the Centromere

Histone variants are the histone proteins with structural and sequence variations. These variants may be regarded as “mutant” forms that replace their canonical histone counterparts in the nucleosomes. Specific post-translational modifications on the histone variants enable further chromatin complexity and regulate tissue-specific gene expression. The most common histone variants are from histone H2A, H2B, and linker histone H1 families. However, several variants of histone H3...
5.1K
Humoral Immune Responses01:36

Humoral Immune Responses

Overview
83.9K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
39.2K