Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Polarization and Characterization of M1 and M2 Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages on Implant Surfaces
Published on: December 6, 2024
Characterization of M1 and M2 polarization phenotypes in peritoneal macrophages after treatment with graphene oxide
María José Feito1, Rosalía Diez-Orejas2, Mónica Cicuéndez3
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Chemistry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract:
Macrophages play a key role in nanoparticle removal and are primarily responsible for their uptake and trafficking in vivo. Due to their functional plasticity, macrophages display a spectrum of phenotypes between two extremes indentified as pro-inflammatory M1 and reparative M2 macrophages, characterized by the expression of specific cell surface markers and the secretion of different cytokines. The influence of graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets functionalized with poly(ethylene glycol-amine) and labelled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC-PEG-GO) on polarization of murine peritoneal macrophages towards M1 and M2 phenotypes was evaluated in basal and stimulated conditions by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy through the expression of different cell markers: CD80 and iNOS as M1 markers, and CD206 and CD163 as M2 markers. Although FITC-PEG-GO did not induce M1 or M2 macrophage polarization after 24 and 48 h in basal conditions, this nanomaterial decreased the percentage of M2 reparative macrophages. We have also compared control macrophages with macrophages that have or have not taken up FITC-PEG-GO after treatment with these nanosheets (GO+ and GO- cells, respectively). The CD80 expression diminished in GO+ macrophages after 48 h of GO treatment but the CD206 expression in GO+ population showed higher values than in both GO- population and control macrophages. In the presence of pro-inflammatory stimuli (LPS and IFN-γ), a significant decrease of CD80+ cells was observed after treatment with GO. This nanomaterial also induced significant decreases of CD206+ and CD163+ cells in the presence of reparative stimulus (IL-4). The CD80, iNOS and CD206 expression was lower in both GO- and GO+ cells than in control macrophages. However, higher CD163 expression was obtained in both GO- and GO+ cells in comparison with control macrophages. All these facts suggest that FITC-PEG-GO uptake did not induce the macrophage polarization towards the M1 pro-inflammatory phenotype, promoting the control of the M1/M2 balance with a slight shift towards M2 reparative phenotype involved in tissue repair, ensuring an appropriate immune response to these nanosheets.
Insights
Graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets did not induce pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage polarization. Instead, FITC-PEG-GO promoted a shift towards M2 reparative macrophages, suggesting controlled immune response for tissue repair.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Immunology
- Nanotechnology
Background:
- Macrophages are crucial for nanoparticle clearance and exhibit plasticity, existing as M1 (pro-inflammatory) or M2 (reparative) phenotypes.
- Graphene oxide (GO) is a nanomaterial with potential biomedical applications, necessitating understanding its interaction with immune cells.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of functionalized graphene oxide (FITC-PEG-GO) on murine peritoneal macrophage polarization.
- To evaluate if FITC-PEG-GO induces M1 or M2 polarization under basal and stimulated conditions.
Main Methods:
- Murine peritoneal macrophages were treated with FITC-PEG-GO.
- Flow cytometry and confocal microscopy were used to analyze cell surface markers (CD80, iNOS for M1; CD206, CD163 for M2).
- Macrophage polarization was assessed in basal and stimulated (LPS, IFN-γ, IL-4) conditions.
Main Results:
- FITC-PEG-GO did not induce M1 or M2 polarization in basal conditions but decreased M2 percentage.
- GO uptake (GO+) showed diminished CD80 and increased CD206 expression compared to GO- and control.
- Under stimulation, GO treatment decreased M1 markers (CD80) and M2 markers (CD206, CD163), except for increased CD163 in both GO+ and GO- cells.
Conclusions:
- FITC-PEG-GO uptake does not induce M1 pro-inflammatory polarization.
- The nanomaterial appears to modulate the M1/M2 balance, with a slight shift towards the M2 reparative phenotype.
- This suggests a controlled immune response and potential for tissue repair applications.
More Related Videos
07:45Metabolic Characterization of Polarized M1 and M2 Bone Marrow-derived Macrophages Using Real-time Extracellular Flux Analysis
Published on: November 28, 2015
06:38Macrophage Differentiation and Polarization into an M2-Like Phenotype using a Human Monocyte-Like THP-1 Leukemia Cell Line
Published on: August 2, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Oxidation Numbers
Group Polarization
Molecular Shape and Polarity
Pyruvate Oxidation
First, the enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase removes the carboxyl group from pyruvate and releases it as carbon dioxide. The stripped molecule is then oxidized and releases electrons, which are then picked up by NAD+...
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Oxidation-Reduction Reactions