Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

11.8K
Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
11.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

101.1K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
101.1K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

14.9K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.9K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.7K
3.7K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

15.3K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
15.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A cross-sectional analysis of county-level determinants of pandemic-era policy implementation.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Identifying predictive hematological biomarkers for radiation exposure by machine learning in mouse models.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Correction: Estimating the Hawthorne Effect in Real-World Blood Pressure Control Trials: An Analysis of the BP Home Trial.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

A quantitative proteomics dataset for assessment and prediction of low dose X-ray radiation exposure in mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

BLOG: Bayesian longitudinal omics with group constraints.

Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology·2026
Same author

Trends in Blood Pressure Control During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study of 17 US Health Systems in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network Blood Pressure Control Laboratory.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes
07:55

Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes

Published on: May 31, 2011

10.7K

Exploiting regulatory heterogeneity to systematically identify enhancers with high accuracy.

Hamutal Arbel1,2, Sumanta Basu3,2,4, William W Fisher5

  • 1Molecular Ecosystems Biology Department, Division of Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720; taly@berkeley.edu bickel@stat.berkeley.edu SECelniker@lbl.gov jbbrown@lbl.gov.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|January 2, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Identifying functional enhancers in early Drosophila development is challenging due to diverse element classes. Focusing on segmentation driving enhancers (SDEs) significantly improves prediction accuracy, revealing key transcription factor roles.

Keywords:
Drosophilaembryo developmentenhancersmachine learningrandom forests

More Related Videos

MEDUSA for Identifying Death Regulatory Genes in Chemo-genetic Profiling Data
07:17

MEDUSA for Identifying Death Regulatory Genes in Chemo-genetic Profiling Data

Published on: February 7, 2025

922
Exploring Sequence Space to Identify Binding Sites for Regulatory RNA-Binding Proteins
11:34

Exploring Sequence Space to Identify Binding Sites for Regulatory RNA-Binding Proteins

Published on: August 9, 2019

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes
07:55

Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes

Published on: May 31, 2011

10.7K
MEDUSA for Identifying Death Regulatory Genes in Chemo-genetic Profiling Data
07:17

MEDUSA for Identifying Death Regulatory Genes in Chemo-genetic Profiling Data

Published on: February 7, 2025

922
Exploring Sequence Space to Identify Binding Sites for Regulatory RNA-Binding Proteins
11:34

Exploring Sequence Space to Identify Binding Sites for Regulatory RNA-Binding Proteins

Published on: August 9, 2019

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Biology
  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Identifying functional enhancer elements in metazoans is a significant challenge.
  • ENCODE predictions show high false-positive rates (≥70%) in large-scale enhancer validation.
  • Heterogeneity in enhancer functional signatures contributes to prediction inaccuracies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the heterogeneity of functional enhancer signatures during early Drosophila embryogenesis.
  • To develop a more accurate method for predicting functional enhancers.
  • To identify and characterize a specific class of highly predictable enhancers.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Drosophila melanogaster pre-gastrula patterning network.
  • Analyzed enhancer activity based on DNA occupancy of early developmental transcription factors and histone modifications.
  • Developed a prediction model focused on a homogeneous class of enhancers.
  • Validated predictions using whole-mount embryonic imaging of reporter constructs.

Main Results:

  • Identified at least two distinct classes of enhancers active during early Drosophila embryogenesis.
  • Achieved >98% prediction accuracy on a held-out test set by focusing on segmentation driving enhancers (SDEs).
  • SDE prediction relies primarily on transcription factor binding, with minimal contribution from histone modifications.
  • Genome-wide scan predicted 1,640 SDEs with >90% validation rate via reporter assays, yielding 86.7% precision and ≥98% recall.

Conclusions:

  • Heterogeneity in enhancer function necessitates class-specific prediction strategies.
  • Segmentation driving enhancers (SDEs) represent a well-defined, accurately predictable class of functional elements.
  • This approach significantly enhances the accuracy and completeness of functional enhancer annotation in Drosophila.