Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Manipulation of Rhythmic Food Intake in Mice Using a Custom-Made Feeding System
Published on: December 16, 2022
A multivariate approach to predict the volumetric and gravimetric feeding behavior of a low feed rate feeder based on
N Bostijn1, J Dhondt1, A Ryckaert1
1Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Process Analytical Technology, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract:
In this study, the volumetric and gravimetric feeding behavior of 15 pharmaceutical powders on a low feed rate feeder was correlated with their material properties through a multivariate approach. The powders under investigation differ substantially in terms of material properties, making the selected powders representative for powders typically used in pharmaceutical manufacturing. The material properties were described by 25 material property descriptors, obtained from a rational selection of critical characterization techniques that provided maximal information with minimal characterization effort. From volumetric feeding experiments (i.e., powder feed rate not controlled), the maximum feeding capacity (maximum feed factor (FFmax)) and optimal hopper fill level at which the feeder should be refilled during gravimetric feeding (feed factor decay (FFdecay)) were obtained. During gravimetric feeding experiments (i.e., powder feed rate controlled), the variability on the feed rate (relative standard deviation (RSD)) and the difference between the setpoint and mean feed rate (relative error (RE)) were determined. Partial least squares (PLS) regression was applied to correlate the volumetric and gravimetric feeding responses (Y) with the material property descriptors (X). The predictive ability of the developed PLS models was assessed by predicting the feeding responses of two new powders (i.e., validation set). Overall, the volumetric feeding responses (FFmax and FFdecay) were predicted better than the gravimetric feeding responses (RSD and RE), since in gravimetric mode the impact of material properties on the feeding behavior is reduced due to the control system of the feeder. Especially RE was weakly correlated with material properties as RE of most powders varied around zero with only a small numerical variation. Interestingly, this confirms that the control system is working properly and that the feeder is capable of feeding different powders accurately at low feed rates. The developed models allowed to predict the feeding behavior of new powders based on their material properties. Consequently the number of feeding experiments during process development can be greatly reduced, thereby leading to a more efficient and faster development of new drug products.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Rate-Determining Steps
In a multistep reaction mechanism, one of the elementary steps progresses significantly slower than the others. This slowest step is called the rate-limiting step (or rate-determining step). A reaction cannot proceed faster than its slowest step, and hence, the rate-determining step limits the overall reaction rate.
The concept of rate-determining step can be understood from the analogy of a 4-lane freeway with a short-stretch of traffic-bottleneck caused due to...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Reaction Rate
The mathematical representation of the change in the concentration of reactants and products, over time, is the rate...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

